Majorities against utility: Implications of the failure of the miracle of aggregation

Social Philosophy and Policy 26 (1):198-211 (2009)
A surprising conclusion of modern political economy is that democracies with highly ignorant voters can still deliver very good results as long as voters' errors balance each other out. This result is known as the Miracle of Aggregation. This paper begins by reviewing a large body of evidence against this Miracle. Empirically, voters' errors tend to be systematic; they compound rather than cancel. Furthermore, since most citizens vote for the policies they believe are best for society, systematic errors lead voters to support socially suboptimal policies. The paper then considers the case for vetoing popular but misguided democratic decisions, presenting several arguments that overruling democratic decisions is much less objectionable than overruling individual decisions. In fact, since democracies routinely adopt paternalistic policies, the opponent of paternalism for individual decisions should embrace paternalism for democratic decisions. The paper concludes by considering several different mechanisms for improving upon majority rule
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0265052509090086
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,470
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Bryan Caplan (2008). Reply to My Critics. Critical Review 20 (3):377-413.
Lisa Hill (2016). Voting Turnout, Equality, Liberty and Representation: Epistemic Versus Procedural Democracy. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 19 (3):283-300.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

21 ( #223,019 of 1,925,584 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #254,998 of 1,925,584 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.