Relocating the responsibility cut: Should more responsibility imply less redistribution?

Politics, Philosophy and Economics 5 (3):353-362 (2006)
Abstract
Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration and Chr. Michelsen Institute, Norway, bertil.tungodden{at}nhh.no ' + u + '@' + d + ' '//--> Liberal egalitarian theories of justice argue that inequalities arising from non-responsibility factors should be eliminated, but that inequalities arising from responsibility factors should be accepted. This article discusses how the fairness argument for redistribution within a liberal egalitarian framework is affected by a relocation of the cut between responsibility and non-responsibility factors. The article also discusses the claim that equalization of some non-responsibility factors will reduce the ideal level of redistribution. Key Words: responsibility • liberal egalitarianism • redistribution.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1470594X06068304
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,133
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Why Egalitarians Should Not Care About Equality.Shlomi Segall - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (4):507 - 519.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
29 ( #181,349 of 2,191,825 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #288,547 of 2,191,825 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature