The nature of Reality: Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument in QM

Authors
Abstract
From conceptual point of view, we argue about the nature of reality inferred from EPR argument in quantum mechanics.
Keywords Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument in QM  Quantum reality
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links
  • This entry has no external links. Add one.

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
  • Only published works are available at libraries.

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Physics of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox.B. H. Kellett - 1977 - Foundations of Physics 7 (9-10):735-757.
Reexamination of the Arguments of Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen.P. A. Moldauer - 1974 - Foundations of Physics 4 (2):195-205.
Logical Refutation of the EPR Argument.Oscar Chavoya-Aceves - 2013 - Physics Essays 26:21-23.
Multinomial Distribution, Quantum Statistics and Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Like Phenomena.Ratan Dasgupta & Sisir Roy - 2008 - Foundations of Physics 38 (4):384-394.
The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument and the Bell Inequalities.László E. Szabó - unknown
On the Formal Connection of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument to Quantum Mechanics and Reality.Daniel Schoch - 1988 - Erkenntnis 29 (2):269 - 278.
The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox Re-Examined.David H. Sharp - 1961 - Philosophy of Science 28 (3):225-233.
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Correct?Gilles Brassard & André Allan Méthot - 2010 - Foundations of Physics 40 (4):463-468.
Photons Uncertainty Removes Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox.Daniele Tommasini - unknown
Epr.Alan Hájek & Jeffrey Bub - 1992 - Foundations of Physics 22 (3):313-332.
The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument in Quantum Theory.Arthur Fine - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Sharp and the Refutation of the Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen Paradox.C. A. Hooker - 1971 - Philosophy of Science 38 (2):224-233.
Philosophy and Physics in the Discussions Between Bohr and Einstein.R. A. Aronov & B. Ia Pakhomov - 1986 - Russian Studies in Philosophy 25 (2):63-87.
A Relativistic Formulation of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox.Gerrit J. Smith & Robert Weingard - 1987 - Foundations of Physics 17 (2):149-171.
Separable Hidden Variables Theory to Explain Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox.S. V. Bhave - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (4):467-475.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-10-05

Total views
86 ( #135,566 of 2,508,046 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #79,765 of 2,508,046 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes



Home | New books and articles | Bibliographies | Philosophy journals | Discussions | Article Index | About PhilPapers | API | Contact us | Code of conduct

CDP Phiosophy Documentation Center
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).

Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation

Server: philpapers-web-6554db7cdd-ck8wg N