Authors
Abstract
From conceptual point of view, we argue about the nature of reality inferred from EPR argument in quantum mechanics.
Keywords Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument in QM  Quantum reality
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Physics of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox.B. H. Kellett - 1977 - Foundations of Physics 7 (9-10):735-757.
The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox Re-Examined.David H. Sharp - 1961 - Philosophy of Science 28 (3):225-233.
Epr.Alan Hájek & Jeffrey Bub - 1992 - Foundations of Physics 22 (3):313-332.
The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument in Quantum Theory.Arthur Fine - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Separable Hidden Variables Theory to Explain Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox.S. V. Bhave - 1986 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 37 (4):467-475.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-10-05

Total views
86 ( #135,566 of 2,508,046 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #79,765 of 2,508,046 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes