Abstract
During the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, open science has become central to experimental, public health, and clinical responses across the globe. Open science is described as an open commons, in which a right to science renders all possible scientific data for everyone to access and use. In this common space, capitalist platforms now provide many essential services and are taking the lead in public health activities. These neoliberal businesses, however, have a problematic role in the capture of public goods. This paper argues that the open commons is a community of rights, consisting of people and institutions whose interests mutually support the public good. If OS is a cornerstone of public health, then reaffirming the public good is its overriding purpose, and unethical platforms ought to be excluded from the commons and its benefits.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0963180120000456
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 68,944
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Taking Rights Seriously.Ronald Dworkin - 1979 - Ethics 90 (1):121-130.
Taking Rights Seriously.Ronald Dworkin - 1979 - Mind 88 (350):305-309.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Tragedies Without Commons.Christopher Knapp - 2011 - Public Affairs Quarterly 25 (1):81-94.
Whose Commons? Data Protection as a Legal Limit of Open Science.Mark Phillips & Bartha M. Knoppers - 2019 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 47 (1):106-111.
Per Una Scienza Aperta.Pietro Greco - 2017 - Scienza E Filosofia 18 (18):255-263.
Renewing and New Types of Innovation.Imre Hronszky & Ágnes Fésüs - 2008 - Teorie Vědy / Theory of Science 30 (1):31-49.
Moore's "New" Open Question Argument.Peter A. Sutton - 2014 - Res Philosophica 91 (4):681-693.
The Foundation of the Child's Right to an Open Future.Joseph Millum - 2014 - Journal of Social Philosophy 45 (4):522-538.
Which Kind of Rights?Daniel Mishori - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 11:103-108.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-06-06

Total views
10 ( #895,712 of 2,498,133 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #428,301 of 2,498,133 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes