Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 30 (1):11-24 (2021)
Abstract |
During the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, open science has become central to experimental, public health, and clinical responses across the globe. Open science is described as an open commons, in which a right to science renders all possible scientific data for everyone to access and use. In this common space, capitalist platforms now provide many essential services and are taking the lead in public health activities. These neoliberal businesses, however, have a problematic role in the capture of public goods. This paper argues that the open commons is a community of rights, consisting of people and institutions whose interests mutually support the public good. If OS is a cornerstone of public health, then reaffirming the public good is its overriding purpose, and unethical platforms ought to be excluded from the commons and its benefits.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1017/s0963180120000456 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think.[author unknown] - 2013
The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations.Robert K. Merton & Norman Storer - 1974 - Science and Society 38 (2):228-231.
“But the Data is Already Public”: On the Ethics of Research in Facebook.Michael Zimmer - 2010 - Ethics and Information Technology 12 (4):313-325.
View all 15 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Open Science por defecto. La nueva normalidad para la investigación.Eva Méndez - 2021 - Arbor 197 (799):a587.
Open Science and Intellectual Property Rights. How Can They Better Interact? State of the Art and Reflections. Report of Study. European Commission.Javier de la Cueva & Eva Méndez - 2022 - Brussels: European Commission.
Similar books and articles
Copyright or Copyleft?: An Analysis of Property Regimes for Software Development.Paul B. de Laat - 2005 - Research Policy 34 (10):1511-1532.
Whose Commons? Data Protection as a Legal Limit of Open Science.Mark Phillips & Bartha M. Knoppers - 2019 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 47 (1):106-111.
Renewing and New Types of Innovation.Imre Hronszky & Ágnes Fésüs - 2008 - Teorie Vědy / Theory of Science 30 (1):31-49.
Internet-Based Commons of Intellectual Resources: An Exploration of Their Variety.Paul B. de Laat - 2006 - In Jacques Berleur, Markku I. Nurminen & John Impagliazzo (eds.), IFIP; Social Informatics: An Information Society for All? In Remembrance of Rob Kling Vol 223. Springer.
Scientific Authorship and E-Commons.Luc Schneider - 2010 - In J. Vallverdu (ed.), Thinking Machines and the Philosophy of Computer Science: Concepts and Principles. Igi Publishing.
Breaking Boundaries: An Investigation of Libertarian Open Borders.Connor K. Kianpour - 2019 - Journal of Libertarian Studies 23 (1):39-63.
Saper Fare Come Valore di Comunità. Per Un Fablab Diffuso, Oltre la Retorica Del Digitale.Pasquale Napolitano - 2017 - Scienza E Filosofia 18 (18):147-161.
The Is-Ought Problem, the Open Question Argument, and the New Science of Morality.Radim Bělohrad - 2011 - Human Affairs 21 (3):262-271.
The Foundation of the Child's Right to an Open Future.Joseph Millum - 2014 - Journal of Social Philosophy 45 (4):522-538.
Open Data, Open Review and Open Dialogue in Making Social Sciences Plausible.Quan-Hoang Vuong - 2017 - Scientific Data 4.
Which Kind of Rights?Daniel Mishori - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 11:103-108.
Breathing Life Into a Dead Argument: G.E. Moore and the Open Question. [REVIEW]Andrew Altman - 2004 - Philosophical Studies 117 (3):395-408.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2020-06-06
Total views
10 ( #895,712 of 2,498,133 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #428,301 of 2,498,133 )
2020-06-06
Total views
10 ( #895,712 of 2,498,133 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #428,301 of 2,498,133 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads