Contextualism, assessor relativism, and insensitive assessments

Logique Et Analyse 52 (208):363-372 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recently, contextualism about epistemic modals and predicates of taste have come under fire from advocates of assessment relativistic analyses. Contextualism, they have argued, fails to account for what we call "felicitous insensitive assessments". In this paper, we provide one hitherto overlooked way in which contextualists can embrace the phenomenon by slightly modifying an assumption that has remained in the background in most of the debate over contextualism and relativism. Finally, we briefly argue that the resulting contextualist account is at least as plausible as the relativist alternative and should be carefully considered before contextualism is abandoned for relativism.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-08-22

Downloads
520 (#18,580)

6 months
12 (#69,964)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gunnar Björnsson
Stockholm University

Citations of this work

Normative Reasons Contextualism.Tim Henning - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (3):593-624.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references