Aquinas on Miracles: Some Thoughts

Think 5 (15):97-107 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Aquinas and Hume view miracles in starkly contrasting ways, as Thomas Carey here explains.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,656

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Historical insights on miracles: Babbage, Hume, Aquinas. [REVIEW]John King-Farlow - 1982 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 13 (4):209 - 218.
Hume's abject failure: the argument against miracles.John Earman - 2000 - New York: Oxford University Press.
A New Interpretation of Hume's 'Of Miracles'.Chris Slupik - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (4):517 - 536.
Prophecy, Early Modern Apologetics, and Hume's Argument against Miracles.Peter Harrison - 1999 - Journal of the History of Ideas 60 (2):241 - 256.
Against Miracles.John Collier - 1986 - Dialogue 25 (2):349-.
Miracles, historical testimonies, and probabilities.Aviezer Tucker - 2005 - History and Theory 44 (3):373–390.
Hume and miracles.Matthew C. Bagger - 1997 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 35 (2):237 - 251.
Contrary miracles concluded.J. C. A. Gaskin - 1985 - Hume Studies 1985 (Supplement):1 - 14.
Hume, Miracles and Lotteries.Dorothy P. Coleman - 1988 - Hume Studies 14 (2):328-346.
Hume and Johnson on prophecy and miracles: Historical context.James E. Force - 1982 - Journal of the History of Ideas 43 (3):463 - 476.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-06-16

Downloads
73 (#205,433)

6 months
3 (#447,120)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references