Critical Horizons 22 (1):89-109 (2021)

Louis Carré
Université Libre de Bruxelles
ABSTRACT Current debates on recognition and domination tend to be characterized by two polarized positions. Where the “anti-recognition” camp views recognition as a tool for establishing and reproducing relations of power, the “pro-recognition” camp conceives it as a way for dominated individuals and social groups to lay stake to intersubjective relations that are more just. At first glance, Honneth’s normative theory of recognition and Bourdieu’s critical sociology of domination also divide along these lines. Honneth takes the pro-recognition stance, criticizing the French sociologist for adopting a “fragmented” conception of the social world that ignores the “moral consensus” underlying each claim for mutual recognition. In contrast, Bourdieu accuses the German philosopher of endorsing an “enchanted” view of the social world that misrecognizes the way that recognition perpetuates symbolic domination. However, through a close and nuanced reading of their works, this article suggests that, in spite of this difference, Honneth’s and Bourdieu’s theories nonetheless converge on the idea that recognition is neither “good” nor “bad” per se, but “structurally ambiguous” in its relations to symbolic domination.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/14409917.2019.1616481
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,021
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Recognition as Ideology.Axel Honneth - 2007 - In Bert van den Brink & David Owen (eds.), Recognition and Power: Axel Honneth and the Tradition of Critical Social Theory. Cambridge University Press. pp. 323--347.
I—Axel Honneth: Invisibility: On the Epistemology of ‘Recognition’.Axel Honneth - 2001 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 75 (1):111-126.
Recognition.Axel Honneth & Avishai Margalit - 2001 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 75:111 - 139.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Herrschaft Begreifen: Anerkennung Und Macht in Axel Honneths Kritischer Theorie.Amy Allen - 2014 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 62 (2):260-278.
Intersubjectivity, Power and Critique.Danielle Petherbridge - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 72:111-118.
Paul Ricœur and the Utopia of Mutual Recognition.Gonçalo Marcelo - 2011 - Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies 2 (1):110-133.
Beyond Recognition? Critical Reflections on Honneth’s Reading of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right.Karin de Boer - 2013 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 21 (4):534 - 558.


Added to PP index

Total views
5 ( #1,153,001 of 2,433,467 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #139,938 of 2,433,467 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes