Acquiescence is Not Agreement: The Problem of Marginalization in Pediatric Decision Making

American Journal of Bioethics 22 (6):4-16 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although parents are the default legal surrogate decision-makers for minor children in the U.S., shared decision making in a pluralistic society is often much more complicated, involving not just parents and pediatricians, but also grandparents, other relatives, and even community or religious elders. Parents may not only choose to involve others in their children’s healthcare decisions but choose to defer to another; such deference does not imply agreement with the decision being made and adds complexity when disagreements arise between surrogate decision-makers for minor children and their physicians. I argue that clinicians and ethicists have a duty to consider voices marginalized by hierarchical structures, including but not limited to gender-based inequalities. This approach involves negotiating potential conflicts: between respecting differences of culture and religion, on one hand, and assuring that the wishes of those who are most invested in children’s lives are considered, on the other.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Medical Futility in Pediatric Care.Felipe E. Vizcarrondo - 2019 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 19 (1):105-120.
Toward a Coherent Account of Pediatric Decision Making.Ana S. Iltis - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (5):526-552.
Beyond “Real Boys” and Back to Parental Obligations.James Hughes - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (3):61-62.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-02-24

Downloads
21 (#742,301)

6 months
8 (#371,375)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?