Consciousness and Cognition 18 (1):300-305 (2009)

Abstract
We examined the question—is the intention of completing a simulated motor action the same as the intention used in processing overt actions? Participants used motor imagery to estimate distance reachability in two conditions: Imagery-Only and Imagery-Execution . With IO only a verbal estimate using imagery was given. With IE participants knew that they would actually reach after giving a verbal estimate and be judged on accuracy. After measuring actual maximum reach, used for the comparison, imagery targets were randomly presented across peripersonal- and extrapersonal space. Results indicated no difference in overall accuracy by condition, however, there was a significant distinction by space; participants were more accurate in peripersonal space. Although more research is needed, these findings support an increasing body of evidence suggesting that the neurocognitive processes driving motor imagery and overt actions are similar
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.concog.2008.07.003
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,066
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Neural Mechanisms Subserving the Perception of Human Actions.J. Decety - 1999 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 (5):172-178.
Embodiment, Spatial Categorisation and Action.Yann Coello & Yvonne Delevoye-Turrell - 2007 - Consciousness and Cognition 16 (3):667-683.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Mental Simulation and Motor Imagery.Gregory Currie & Ian Ravenscroft - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (1):161-80.
Emulation of Kinesthesia During Motor Imagery.Norihiro Sadato & Eiichi Naito - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):412-413.
Amodal Imagery in Rostral Premotor Areas.Takashi Hanakawa, Manabu Honda & Mark Hallett - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (3):406-407.
Time Matters! Implications From Mentally Imaged Motor Actions.Markus Raab & Marc Boschker - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):208-209.
Intention and Motor Representation in Purposive Action.Stephen Andrew Butterfill & Corrado Sinigaglia - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (1):119-145.
Conscious Intention and Motor Cognition.Patrick Haggard - 2005 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (6):290-295.
Imaginative Contagion.Tamar Szabo Gendler - 2006 - Metaphilosophy 37 (2):183-203.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-24

Total views
403 ( #21,744 of 2,454,516 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,188 of 2,454,516 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes