Between freedom and necessity: Félix ravaisson on habit and the moral life

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 53 (2):123 – 145 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper examines Feacutelix Ravaisson's account of habit, as presented in his 1838 essay _Of Habit_, and considers its significance in the context of moral practice. This discussion is set in an historical context by drawing attention to the different evaluations of habit in Aristotelian and Kantian philosophies, and it is argued that Kant's hostility to habit is based on the dichotomy between mind and body, and freedom and necessity, that pervades his thought. Ravaisson argues that the phenomenon of habit challenges these dualisms, and at least in this respect anticipates the discussions of habit in the work of twentieth-century phenomenologists such as Merleau-Ponty and Ricoeur.

The paper outlines Ravaisson's account of habit in general, showing how his analysis of the “double law” of habit develops from the work of Maine de Biran, and highlighting the way in which Ravaisson offers a new and original philosophical interpretation of the phenomena of habit. Whereas Maine de Biran remains within a dualistic framework, and finds that habit is problematic within this framework, Ravaisson uses habit to demonstrate continuity between mind and body, will and nature. Then the focus is narrowed to consider how this analysis of habit is applied to a specifically moral context, and how it illuminates traditional Aristotelian theories of virtue. The paper ends by considering several practical consequences of the foregoing discussion of habit and the moral life



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Lived time and absolute knowing: Habit and addiction from infinite jest to the phenomenology of spirit.David Morris - 2001 - Clio: A Journal of Literature, History, and the Philosophy of History 30 (4):375-415.
Ravaisson and the force of habit.Mark Sinclair - 2011 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 49 (1):65-85.
Merleau-Ponty and the Bodily Subject of Learning.Maria Talero - 2006 - International Philosophical Quarterly 46 (2):191-203.
Explaining Actions with Habits.Bill Pollard - 2006 - American Philosophical Quarterly 43 (1):57 - 69.


Added to PP

96 (#180,973)

6 months
8 (#370,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Clare Carlisle
King's College London

References found in this work

What should we do with our brain?Catherine Malabou - 2008 - New York: Fordham University Press.

Add more references