Theory and Decision 77 (3):313-322 (2014)

Experiments on intertemporal consumption typically show that people have difficulties in optimally solving such problems. Previous studies have focused on contexts in which agents are faced with risky future incomes and have to plan over long horizons. We present an experiment comparing decision making under certainty, risk, and ambiguity, over a shorter lifecycle. Results show that behavior in the ambiguity treatment is markedly different than in the risk condition and it is characterized by a significant pattern of under-consumption.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11238-014-9443-2
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,037
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Understanding Consumption.Angus Deaton - 1992 - Oxford University Press UK.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Quantification, Regulation, and Risk Assessment.Douglas MacLean - 1982 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:243 - 260.
Jaffray’s Ideas on Ambiguity.Peter P. Wakker - 2011 - Theory and Decision 71 (1):11-22.


Added to PP index

Total views
14 ( #712,063 of 2,454,409 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,269 of 2,454,409 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes