This paper argues that a Cartesian belief in the self-transparency of minds might actually be an innate aspect of our mind-reading faculty. But it acknowledges that some crucial evidence needed to establish this claim hasn’t been looked for or collected. What we require is evidence that a belief in the self-transparency of mind is universal to the human species. The paper closes with a call to anthropologists (and perhaps also developmental psychologists), who are in a position to collect such evidence, encouraging them to do so.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Hylomorphism and Post-Cartesian Philosophy of Mind.William Jaworski - 2006 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:209-224.
Descartes Mistake: How Afterlife Beliefs Challenge the Assumption That Humans Are Intuitive Cartesian Dualists.K. Mitch Hodge - 2008 - Journal of Cognition and Culture 8 (3-4):387-415.
The Immaterial Self: A Defense of the Cartesian Dualist Conception of Mind.John A. Foster - 1991 - Routledge.
From Cartesian Epistemology to Cartesian Metaphysics.Peter J. Markie - 1985 - Philosophical Topics 13 (2):195-204.
Descartes, Consciousness and Depersonalization: Viewing the History of Philosophy From a Strausian Perspective.Avner Cohen - 1984 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 9 (1):7-28.
Dennett's Mind.Michael Lockwood - 1993 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 36 (1-2):59-72.
Cartesian Epistemology: Is the Theory of the Self-Transparent Mind Innate?Peter Carruthers - 2008 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (4):28-53.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads60 ( #87,805 of 2,172,021 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #325,967 of 2,172,021 )
How can I increase my downloads?