Journal of Semantics 7 (4):435-454 (1990)
Abstract |
Much research in computational linguistics has concentrated on treating the individual phenomena of natural language rather than on how these treatments can be made to work together. This paper discusses four respects in which processes embodying individual treatments must be made to co-operate with one another if anaphoric expressions are to be interpreted correctly. These are the co-ordination of (1) treatments of anaphoric and non-anaphoric ambiguity in a sentence; (2) treatments of different kinds of knowledge relevant to interpretation; (3) the resolution of several anaphors in one sentence; and (4) candidate referents arising from several sources. It is argued that a flexible control structure based on numerical scoring allows the required co-operation to take place, whereas a more limited depth-first architecture seems not to allow this. The discussion is grounded in comparisons between two very different implemented systems that resolve anaphors. The first, SPAR, is an experimental system embodying the control structure argued for. The second, the SRI Core Language Engine, is a wide-coverage system intended for practical applications. Its control structure is, at the time of writing, depth-first, but planned enhancements will allow the problems discussed in the paper to be tackled, resulting in the development of a powerful and widely applicable natural processor
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1093/jos/7.4.435 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Semantic Interpretation and the Resolution of Ambiguity.Graeme Hirst - 1987 - Cambridge University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Linguistic and Cognitive Prominence in Anaphor Resolution: Topic, Contrastive Focus and Pronouns.H. Wind Cowles, Matthew Walenski & Robert Kluender - 2007 - Topoi 26 (1):3-18.
Toward a Cognitive Neuroscience of Metacognition.Arthur P. Shimamura - 2000 - Consciousness and Cognition 9 (2):313-323.
Common Sense Inference in a Focus-Guided Anaphor Resolver.David M. Carter - 1985 - Journal of Semantics 4 (3):237-246.
Do Movement Planning and Control Represent Independent Modules?Valérie Gaveau & Michel Desmurget - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (1):35-36.
Thinking Sociologically with Mathematics.David R. Heise - 2000 - Sociological Theory 18 (3):498-504.
Perceptive Actions in Tetris.David Kirsh & Paul Maglio - 1992 - Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium.
Successful Relationships: At Home, at Work, and with Friends: Bringing Control Issues Under Control.Abraham J. Twerski - 2003 - Mesorah Publications.
Bridging the Divide: The Role of Perceived Control in Mediating Reasoning and Activism.Philip G. Laird - 2003 - Journal of Moral Education 32 (1):35-49.
Affect and the Resolution of Cognitive Control Dilemmas.R. Gray Jeremy, Tood Alexandre Schaefer, Steven S. Braver & B. Most - 2005 - In Lisa Feldman Barrett, Paula M. Niedenthal & Piotr Winkielman (eds.), Emotion and Consciousness. Guilford Press.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2010-09-02
Total views
21 ( #534,228 of 2,504,853 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,030 of 2,504,853 )
2010-09-02
Total views
21 ( #534,228 of 2,504,853 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,030 of 2,504,853 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads