Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (3):253-265 (2004)

Authors
Robert F. Card
University of Rochester
Abstract
Elizabeth Anderson claims that states of affairs are merely extrinsically valuable, since we value them only in virtue of the intrinsically valuable persons in those states of affairs. Since it considers states of affairs to be the sole bearers of intrinsic value, Anderson argues that consequentialism is incoherent because it attempts to globally maximize extrinsic value. I respond to this objection by distinguishing between two forms of consequentialist teleology and arguing that Anderson''s claim is either harmless or her argument for the claim is uncompelling. On the first conception of teleology, consequentialists need not hold that states of affairs are the sole bearers of intrinsic value, which allows them to deflect this criticism. On the second account of teleology, even assuming that states of affairs are the sole bearers of intrinsic value, Anderson''s argument does not necessarily defeat such views
Keywords consequentialism  extrinsic value  intrinsic value  maximization  value
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2005
DOI 10.1023/b:etta.0000042913.16944.e6
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,268
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Two Concepts of Intrinsic Value.Ben Bradley - 2006 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (2):111-130.
Intrinsic Vs. Extrinsic Value.Michael J. Zimmerman - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
On the Incoherence Objection to Rule-Utilitarianism.Alex Rajczi - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (4):857-876.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Aquinas and Modern Contractualism.Don Adams - 2009 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (4):509 – 530.
Truth Breakers.Dale Jacquette - 2010 - Topoi 29 (2):153-163.
Does Armstrong Need States of Affairs?James D. Rissler - 2006 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (2):193 – 209.
States of Affairs.Hans Kraml - 1998 - Erkenntnis 48 (2-3):311-324.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
52 ( #177,387 of 2,325,396 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #298,641 of 2,325,396 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes