Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 6 (2):81-93 (2013)
AbstractThis paper is a commentary comparing the evolutionary perspectives of Denis Dutton’s The Art Instinct (2009) and Stephen Davies’s The Artful Species (2012). Their topics thus necessarily overlap, but their books have different purposes and a different feel. Davies’s book is an academic exercise. He has no real arguments or claims of his own. Dutton wishes to demonstrate that evolutionary psychology can provide a satisfying naturalistic explanation of aesthetic experience. Neither Davies nor Dutton fully succeeds in his ambition. Davies extends his scepticism well beyond a sensible account of the state of current knowledge about human evolution, and Dutton fails to recognize underlying theoretical differences in his main sources of theoretical inspiration. The limitations in these two works do not define the boundaries of current knowledge in evolutionary aesthetics. The most advanced and adequate concept in the evolutionary humanities is the idea that humans evolved the capacity to create imaginative virtual worlds and use those worlds to guide human behaviour. Both books being considered in this essay approach the idea of imaginative virtual worlds and almost grasp it. Before taking up that topic, the paper shall discuss two subsidiary issues: Dutton’s effort to incorporate sexual selection, and Davies’s sceptical negations about all evolutionary knowledge
Similar books and articles
Evolutionary Aesthetics: Denis Dutton’s The Art Instinct: Beauty, Pleasure and Human Evolution: Bloomsbury Press, New York, 2009.Justine Kingsbury - 2011 - Biology and Philosophy 26 (1):141-150.
The Arts and Human Nature: Evolutionary Aesthetics and the Evolutionary Status of Art Behaviours: Stephen Davies: The Artful Species: Aesthetics, Art, and Evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012.Anton Killin - 2013 - Biology and Philosophy 28 (4):703-718.
Art, Sexual Selection, Group Selection (Critical Notice of Denis Dutton, The Art Instinct).Mohan Matthen - 2011 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (2):337-356.
Can Science Lead Us to a Definition of Art?Kathryn Coe - 2013 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 6 (2):153-177.
Aesthetics and Evolutionary Psychology.Denis Dutton - 2003 - In Jerrold Levinson (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics. Oxford University Press.
Evolutionary Aesthetics: An Introduction to Key Concepts and Current Issues.Hannes Rusch & Eckart Voland - 2013 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 6 (2):113-133.
The Art Instinct: Beauty, Pleasure, and Human Evolution.Denis Dutton - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Foreword.Lorenzo Bartalesi & Mariagrazia Portera - 2013 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 6 (2):3-4.
The Evolutionary Value of an Aesthetic Sense.Stephen Davies - 2013 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 6 (2):75-79.
The Artful Species: Aesthetics, Art, and Evolution.Stephen Davies - 2012 - Oxford University Press.
Denis Dutton, The Art Instinct: Beauty, Pleasure, and Human Evolution. [REVIEW]Tomas Hribek - 2011 - Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 48 (2):248-253.
The Art Instinct: Beauty, Pleasure, & Human Evolution.Denis Dutton - 2009 - Bloomsbury Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Philosophy of Animal-Made Art | فلسفهی هنرِ جانور-ساخت.Pouya Lotfi Yazdi - forthcoming - Tehran: Negah-e Moaser Publishing.
Reviews & Comments.A. Cura di Mariagrazia Portera - 2015 - Aisthesis: Pratiche, Linguaggi E Saperi Dell’Estetico 8 (1):181-203.
References found in this work
No references found.