Philo 10 (1):85-90 (2007)
In a previous issue of Philo, Michael Almeida claimed to have “defeated” William Rowe’s “New Evidential Argument from Evil” againstthe existence of a benevolent god. However, Almeida’s argument suffers from serious logical errors and even logical absurdities, leaving Rowe’s argument intact and quite unthreatened by anything Almeida argues
|Keywords||Philosophy and Religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Rowe's New Evidential Argument From Evil: Problems and Prospects. [REVIEW]Nick Trakakis - 2006 - Sophia 45 (1):57-77.
On Rowe's Argument From Particular Horrors.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 2005 - In Kelly Clark (ed.), Readings in Philosophy of Religion. Broadview.
William Rowe's Bayesian Argument from Evil against the Existence of God: An Attempt at Analysis and Assessment (in Polish).Krzysztof Hubaczek - 2007 - Diametros 14:32 - 52.
Sceptical Theism and Evidential Arguments From Evil.Michael J. Almeida & Graham Oppy - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (4):496 – 516.
In Defence of Sceptical Theism: A Reply to Almeida and Oppy.Michael Bergmann & Michael C. Rea - 2005 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (2):241 – 251.
Blocking Rowe's New Evidential Argument From Evil.Jeff Jordan - 2001 - Religious Studies 37 (4):435-449.
Added to index2011-02-24
Total downloads38 ( #132,529 of 2,153,823 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #279,963 of 2,153,823 )
How can I increase my downloads?