The Leibniz Review 7:1-24 (1997)
Throughout his early writings, Leibniz was concerned with developing an acceptable account of God's relationship to the created world. In some of these early writings, he endorsed the idea that this relationship was similar to the human soul's relationship to the body. Though he eventually came to reject this idea, theanima mundi thesis remained the topic of several essays and correspondences during his career, culminating in the correspondence with Clarke. At first glance,Leibniz's discussions of this thesis may seem less important in comparison to others, since it might seem like a topic which is far removed from what are regarded as his most important philosophical doctrines. I hope to show in what follows that such a view is mistaken. The large amount of attention Leibniz paid to this thesis is a sure indication of its importance to him. Further, as we shall see, his discussions of this thesis tum on some of his most interesting metaphysical topics, including the development of his thinking about the actual infinite, the structure of organic wholes, and the relationship between God and the created universe. In what follows, I examine these discussions chronologically, from the De Summa Rerum (1675-6), to the correspondence with Clarke (1715-6)
|Keywords||History of Philosophy Major Philosophers|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Leibniz on Infinite Numbers, Infinite Wholes, and Composite Substances.Adam Harmer - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (2):236-259.
Similar books and articles
Leibniz on Substance and God in “That a Most Perfect Being Is Possible”.Nicholas Okrent - 2000 - Philosophy and Theology 12 (1):79-93.
A Tale of Two Thinkers, One Meeting, and Three Degrees of Infinity: Leibniz and Spinoza (1675–8).Ohad Nachtomy - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (5):935-961.
Leibniz and Clarke: A Study of Their Correspondence.Ezio Vailati - 1997 - Oup Usa.
Why Shouldn't Leibniz Have Studied Spinoza?Ursula Goldenbaum - 2007 - The Leibniz Review 17:107-138.
Leibniz on Infinite Number, Infinite Wholes, and the Whole World.Richard Arthur - 2001 - The Leibniz Review 11:103-116.
Leibniz and the Post-Copernican Universe. Koyre Revisited.R. M. - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (2):309-327.
Infinite Number and the World Soul; in Defence of Carlin and Leibniz.Richard Arthur - 1999 - The Leibniz Review 9:105-116.
Leibniz and Locke on Natural Kinds.Brandon C. Look - 2009 - In Vlad Alexandrescu (ed.), Branching Off: The Early Moderns in Quest for the Unity of Knowledge. Zeta Books.
The Empirical Grounds for Leibniz's 'Real Metaphysics'.Paul Lodge - 2010 - The Leibniz Review 20:13-36.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads27 ( #185,030 of 2,152,238 )
Recent downloads (6 months)12 ( #44,981 of 2,152,238 )
How can I increase my downloads?