In Christopher R. Hitchcock (ed.), Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Science. Blackwell (2003)
This chapter defends the positive thesis which constitutes its title. It argues first, that the mind has been shaped by natural selection; and second, that the result of that shaping process is a modular mental architecture. The arguments presented are all broadly empirical in character, drawing on evidence provided by biologists, neuroscientists and psychologists (evolutionary, cognitive, and developmental), as well as by researchers in artificial intelligence. Yet the conclusion is at odds with the manifest image of ourselves provided both by introspection and by common-sense psychology. The chapter concludes by sketching how a modular architecture might be developed to account for the patently unconstrained character of human thought, which has served as an assumption in a number of recent philosophical attacks on mental modularity
|Keywords||Evolution Mind Module Natural Selection|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Context-Sensitive Inference, Modularity, and the Assumption of Formal Processing.Mitch Parsell - 2005 - Philosophical Psychology 18 (1):45-58.
Quick and Smart? Modularity and the Pro-Emotion Consensus.Karen Jones - 2006 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36 (sup1):2-27.
Cognitive Modularity of Emotion.Louis C. Charland - 2006 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36 (sup1):213-228.
Prcis of “Why Think?” Evolution and the Rational Mind.Ronald de Sousa - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (5):4 – 9.
Against Emotional Modularity.Ronald de Sousa - 2006 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36 (sup1):29-50.
Similar books and articles
The Units of Selection Revisited: The Modules of Selection. [REVIEW]Robert N. Brandon - 1999 - Biology and Philosophy 14 (2):167-180.
Us, Them and It: Modules, Genes, Environments and Evolution.Fiona Cowie - 2008 - Mind and Language 23 (3):284–292.
The Case for Massively Modular Models of Mind.Peter Carruthers - 2006 - In Robert J. Stainton (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Science. Blackwell.
Massively Modular Minds: Evolutionary Psychology and Cognitive Architecture.Richard Samuels - 2000 - In Peter Carruthers (ed.), Evolution and the Human Mind. Cambridge University Press. pp. 13--46.
The Mind is Not (Just) a System of Modules Shaped (Just) by Natural Selection.James F. Woodward & Fiona Cowie - 2004 - In Christopher Hitchcock (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Science. Malden MA: Blackwell. pp. 312-34.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads68 ( #76,747 of 2,164,554 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #188,462 of 2,164,554 )
How can I increase my downloads?