Authors
Abstract
At the end of the essay “Silhouettes” in Either/Or , Kierkegaard writes, “only the person who has been bitten by snakes knows what one who has been bitten by snakes must suffer.” I interpret this as an allusion to Alcibiades' speech in Plato's Symposium. Kierkegaard invites the reader to compare Socrates to Don Giovanni, and Alcibiades to the seduced women. Socrates' philosophical method, in this light, is a deceptive seduction: just as Don Giovanni's seduction leads his conquests to unhappy love—what Kierkegaard terms “reflective sorrow”—so the elenctic method leads Socrates' interlocutors to aporia, not to knowledge. I offer a critique of Socratic irony, a stance reflected in the theory of love Socrates presents in the Symposium, and suggest that philosophy should instead be modeled on Alcibiades' and the Silhouettes' approach to love.
Keywords Kierkegaard  Plato  love  irony  Socrates  Alcibiades
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00201740903478392
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,242
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Plato and the Love of Individuals.T. Brian Mooney - 2002 - Heythrop Journal 43 (3):311–327.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-07-27

Total views
122 ( #86,410 of 2,444,828 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #185,966 of 2,444,828 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes