Philosophy and Social Criticism 35 (6):671-684 (2009)
Levinas is often credited with introducing a strong notion of ethics into postmodern thought. But his commitment to Zionism, his views on the Palestinian people, and his underformulated theory of justice raise questions about the desirability of his thinking for politics. In this study, the well-known encounter between Levinas and the Palestinians is addressed in order to determine how his philosophy of ethics can be deployed for political ends. As the philosopher famously concerned with the connection between self and the Other, the relation between Levinas, Israel and the Palestinians stands as the natural political test of his ethics. Based on this encounter, it is demonstrated that Levinasian justice is too unsafe as a prescription for a political order. Only when Levinas' ethics as first philosophy is supported by love as first politics is his Messianic polity acceptable
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
The Politics of Justice: Levinas, Violence, and the Ethical–Political Relation.Gavin Rae - forthcoming - Contemporary Political Theory:1-20.
Similar books and articles
Levinas's Jewish Thought: Between Jerusalem and Athens.Ephraim Meir - 2008 - The Hebrew University Magnes Press.
The Rationality of Transcendence: Studies in the Philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas.Theodorus de Boer - 1997 - J.C. Gieben.
Added to index2009-06-13
Total downloads39 ( #134,036 of 2,178,112 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #166,129 of 2,178,112 )
How can I increase my downloads?