Metaepistemology

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Whereas epistemology is the philosophical theory of knowledge, its nature and scope, metaepistemology takes a step back from particular substantive debates in epistemology in order to inquire into the assumptions and commitments made by those who engage in these debates. This entry will focus on a selection of these assumptions and commitments, including whether there are objective epistemic facts; and how to characterize the subject matter and the methodology of epistemology.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 94,659

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Metaepistemology.Christos Kyriacou - 2016 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Metaepistemology.Mikkel Gerken - 2018 - Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Metaepistemology and Relativism.Joseph Adam Carter - 2016 - Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
The metaepistemology of knowing-how.Cheng-Hung Tsai - 2011 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 10 (4):541-556.
Metaepistemology.Kyriacou Christos - 2016 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Metaepistemology.Conor Mchugh, Jonathan Way & Daniel Whiting (eds.) - 2018 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Conceptual Ethics, Metaepistemology, and Normative Epistemology.Tristram McPherson & David Plunkett - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy:1-33.
Metaepistemology and Skepticism.Stewart Cohen - 1998 - Philosophical and Phenomenological Research 58 (4):913-918.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-11-05

Downloads
233 (#91,246)

6 months
41 (#110,671)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

J. Adam Carter
University of Glasgow
Ernest Sosa
Rutgers University - New Brunswick

Citations of this work

Trust and Trustworthiness.J. Adam Carter - 2022 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (2):377-394.
Epistemic normativity is not independent of our goals.J. Adam Carter - 2024 - In Blake Roeber, Ernest Sosa, Matthias Steup & John Turri (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology, 3rd edition. Wiley-Blackwell.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Ian Hacking.
Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature.Richard Rorty - 1979 - Princeton University Press.
Studies in the way of words.Herbert Paul Grice - 1989 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

View all 142 references / Add more references