Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Whereas epistemology is the philosophical theory of knowledge, its nature and scope, metaepistemology takes a step back from particular substantive debates in epistemology in order to inquire into the assumptions and commitments made by those who engage in these debates. This entry will focus on a selection of these assumptions and commitments, including whether there are objective epistemic facts; and how to characterize the subject matter and the methodology of epistemology.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,346

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Metaepistemology.Christos Kyriacou - 2016 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Metaepistemology and Relativism.Joseph Adam Carter - 2016 - Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Epistemological Open Questions.Daniel Greco - 2015 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93 (3):509-523.
The metaepistemology of knowing-how.Cheng-Hung Tsai - 2011 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 10 (4):541-556.
Permissive Metaepistemology.David Thorstad - 2019 - Mind 128 (511):907-926.
Metaepistemology.Conor Mchugh, Jonathan Way & Daniel Whiting (eds.) - 2018 - Oxford University Press.
Metaepistemology.Mikkel Gerken - 2018 - Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Is Epistemology Autonomous?Daniel Greco - 2019 - In John McHugh, Jonathan Way & Daniel Whiting (eds.), Metaepistemology. Oxford University Press.
Metaepistemology and Skepticism.Richard Fumerton - 1997 - Mind 106 (424):782-787.
Thick epistemic concepts.Debbie Roberts - forthcoming - In Conor McHugh, Jonathan Way & Daniel Whiting (eds.), Metaepistemology. Oxford University Press.


Added to PP

129 (#98,784)

6 months
21 (#53,717)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Trust and Trustworthiness.J. Adam Carter - 2022 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Epistemic normativity is not independent of our goals.J. Adam Carter - 2022 - In Ernest Sosa, Matthias Steup, John Turri & Blake Roeber (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology, 3rd Edition. Wiley-Blackwell.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1962 - University of Chicago Press.
Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature.Richard Rorty - 1979 - Princeton University Press.
Studies in the Way of Words.Herbert Paul Grice - 1989 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

View all 142 references / Add more references