Journal of Moral Education 37 (4):485-502 (2008)

Authors
Abstract
Scholars have noted the need to examine the psychometric properties of measures that can be used in evaluating moral education programs. The present study was designed to examine the best?fitting factor model of a commonly?used measure of prosocial moral reasoning (PROM) across samples from Brazil and the USA, gender and adolescent age groups. The samples consisted of 619 college students (M age = 20.59 years, SD = 4.08; 41% men, 59% women) and 239 middle and high school students (M age = 14.02 years, SD = 3.04; 45% boys, 55% girls) from the USA. There were 114 college students (M age = 21.81, SD = 4.33; 35% men, 65% women) and 136 middle and high school students (M age = 14.93 years, SD = 1.55; 42% boys, 58% girls) from Brazil. A series of (multigroup) confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to test the best fitting factor structure of the PROM and the invariance of this factor structure across culture, gender and age groups. Evidence for measurement invariance was found such that a four?factor model was a slightly better fitting model than the five?factor model across all groups. Discussion focuses on theoretical and methodological implications of the findings
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/03057240802399368
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,209
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Measurement of Moral Judgment.Anne Colby - 1987 - Cambridge University Press.
World Hypotheses: A Study in Evidence.Stephen C. Pepper - 1942 - Berkeley and Los Angeles, University of California Press.
Affect, Culture, and Morality, Or Is It Wrong to Eat Your Dog?Jonathan Haidt, Silvia Helena Koller & Maria G. Dias - 1993 - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65 (4):613-28.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Studying Moral Reasoning in Business Settings: A New Methodological Approach.Elaine Mcgivern & James Weber - 2006 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 17:18-23.
Moral Reasoning of Nigerian and Pakistani Muslim Adolescents.M. Maqsud - 1977 - Journal of Moral Education 7 (1):40-41.
Tolerance and Moral Reasoning Among Adolescents in Ireland.Ann Breslin - 1982 - Journal of Moral Education 11 (2):112-127.
Peer Assessment of Children's Prosocial Behaviour.Susan Hayes Greener - 2000 - Journal of Moral Education 29 (1):47-60.
Moral Reasoning.Gilbert Harman, Kelby Mason & Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2010 - In John Michael Doris (ed.), The Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-02

Total views
28 ( #393,225 of 2,455,351 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,153 of 2,455,351 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes