In Anthony O'Hear (ed.), Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement. Cambridge University Press. pp. 67-89 (2003)

Authors
Peter Carruthers
University of Maryland, College Park
Abstract
This paper will sketch a model of the human mind according to which the mind’s structure is massively, but by no means wholly, modular. Modularity views in general will be motivated, elucidated, and defended, before the thesis of moderately massive modularity is explained and elaborated.
Keywords Mind  Modularity
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
DOI 10.1017/S1358246100008274
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,066
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Modularity of Mind.Robert Cummins & Jerry Fodor - 1983 - Philosophical Review 94 (1):101.

View all 34 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

On Fodor's Problem.Peter Carruthers - 2003 - Mind and Language 18 (5):502-523.
The Reflexive Theory of Perception.John Dilworth - 2005 - Behavior and Philosophy 33 (1):17-40.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Simple Heuristics Meet Massive Modularity.Peter Carruthers - 2006 - In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen P. Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. Oxford University Press.
On the Input Problem for Massive Modularity.John M. Collins - 2004 - Minds and Machines 15 (1):1-22.
Structural Flaws: Massive Modularity and the Argument From Design.Armin Schulz - 2008 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (4):733-743.
Massive Modularity and Brain Evolution.Edouard Machery - 2007 - Philosophy of Science 74 (5):825-838.
On Fodor's The Mind Doesn't Work That Way.Daniel A. Weiskopf - 2002 - Philosophical Psychology 15 (4):551-562.
Is the Mind Really Modular?Jesse J. Prinz - 2006 - In Robert J. Stainton (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Science. Blackwell. pp. 22--36.
The Complexity of Cognition: Tractability Arguments for Massive Modularity.Richard Samuels - 2005 - In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. New York: Oxford University Press New York. pp. 107.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
185 ( #62,337 of 2,498,773 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #422,193 of 2,498,773 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes