Moral theory and global population

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99 (3):289–313 (1999)
Abstract
Ascertaining the optimum global population raises not just substantive moral problems but also philosophical ones, too. In particular, serious problems arise for utilitarianism. For example, should one attempt to bring about the greatest total happiness or the highest level of average happiness? This article argues that neither approach on its own provides a satisfactory answer, and nor do rights-based or Rawlsian approaches, either. Instead, what is required is a multidimensional approach to moral questions—one which recognises the plurality of our values. Such an approach can be formalised by employing multidimensional indifference-curves. Moreover, whereas classical utilitarianism might be thought to enjoin us to bring about a larger global population, a multidimensional approach clearly suggests a significant reduction in human numbers.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1467-9264.00061
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,655
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Morality and Freedom.By Alan Carter - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (211):161–180.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

102 ( #48,702 of 2,158,201 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #65,193 of 2,158,201 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums