Negation, expressivism, and intentionality

Philosophical Quarterly 70 (279):246-267 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many think that expressivists have a special problem with negation. I disagree. For if there is a problem with negation, I argue, it is a problem shared by those who accept some plausible claims about the nature of intentionality. Whether there is any special problem for expressivists turns, I will argue, on whether facts about what truth-conditions beliefs have can explain facts about basic inferential relations among those beliefs. And I will suggest that the answer to this last question is, on most plausible attempts at solving the problem of intentionality, ‘no’.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-03

Downloads
649 (#35,316)

6 months
134 (#34,480)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alejandro Pérez Carballo
University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Citations of this work

Noncognitivism without expressivism.Bob Beddor - 2023 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 107 (3):762-788.
An Expressivist Theory of Taste Predicates.Dilip Ninan - 2024 - Philosophers' Imprint 24 (1).

Add more citations

References found in this work

Meaning.Herbert Paul Grice - 1957 - Philosophical Review 66 (3):377-388.
Knowledge and the flow of information.F. Dretske - 1989 - Trans/Form/Ação 12:133-139.
The Language of Thought.J. A. Fodor - 1978 - Critica 10 (28):140-143.
Wise Choices, Apt Feelings.Alan Gibbard - 1990 - Ethics 102 (2):342-356.

View all 64 references / Add more references