Walter Carnielli
University of Campinas
Abilio Rodrigues
Federal University of Minas Gerais
From the technical point of view, philosophically neutral, the duality between a paraconsistent and a paracomplete logic lies in the fact that explosion does not hold in the former and excluded middle does not hold in the latter. From the point of view of the motivations for rejecting explosion and excluded middle, this duality can be interpreted either ontologically or epistemically. An ontological interpretation of intuitionistic logic is Brouwer’s idealism; of paraconsistency is dialetheism. The epistemic interpretation of intuitionistic logic is in terms of preservation of constructive proof; of paraconsistency is in terms of preservation of evidence. In this paper, we explain and defend the epistemic approach to paraconsistency. We argue that it is more plausible than dialetheism and allows a peaceful and fruitful coexistence with classical logic.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/jigpal/jzz041
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,410
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Paradox of the Preface.David C. Makinson - 1965 - Analysis 25 (6):205.
Logical Pluralism.Jc Beall & Greg Restall - 2000 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 78 (4):475 – 493.
``The Paradox of the Preface".D. Makinson - 1965 - Analysis 25 (6):205-207.

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Paraconsistent Logic.Graham Priest - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Paraconsistency and its Philosophical Interpretations.Eduardo Barrio & Bruno Da Re - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Logic 15 (2):151-170.
Remarks on the Epistemic Interpretation of Paraconsistent Logic.Nicolás Lo Guercio & Damian Szmuc - 2018 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 22 (1):153-170.
Paraconsistency Everywhere.Greg Restall - 2002 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 43 (3):147-156.
Axioms for Classical, Intuitionistic, and Paraconsistent Hybrid Logic.Torben Braüner - 2006 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 15 (3):179-194.
Yes, Virginia, There Really Are Paraconsistent Logics.Bryson Brown - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (5):489-500.
Implicit Versus Explicit Knowledge in Dialogical Logic.Manuel Rebuschi - 2009 - In Ondrej Majer, Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen & Tero Tulenheimo (eds.), Games: Unifying Logic, Language, and Philosophy. Springer Verlag. pp. 229--246.


Added to PP index

Total views
14 ( #735,280 of 2,519,700 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #205,238 of 2,519,700 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes