Fundamenta Scientiae 8 (1):73-91 (1987)

Francisco Caruso
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
Why is space 3-dimensional? The fi rst answer to this question, entirely based on Physics, was given by Ehrenfest, in 1917, who showed that the stability requirement for n-dimensional two-body planetary system very strongly constrains space dimensionality, favouring 3-d. This kind of approach will be generically called "stability postulate" throughout this paper and was shown by Tangherlini, in 1963, to be still valid in the framework of general relativity as well as for quantum mechanical hydrogen atom, giving the same constraint for space{dimensionality. In the present work, before criticizing this methodology, a brief discussion has been introduced, aimed at stressing and clarifying some general physical aspects of the problem of how to determine the number of space dimensions. Then, the epistemological consequences of Ehrenfest's methodology are critically reviewed. An alternative procedure to get at the proper number of dimensions, in which the stability postulate - and the implicit singularities in three-dimensional physics - are not an essential part of the argument, is proposed. In this way, the main epistemological problems contained in Ehrenfest's original idea are avoided. The alternative methodology proposed in this paper is realized by obtaining and discussing the n-dimensional quantum theory as expressed in Planck's law, de Broglie relation and the Heisenberg uncertainty relation. As a consequence, it is possible to propose an experiment, based on thermal neutron di raction by crystals, to directly measure space dimensionality. Finally the distinguished role of Maxwell's electromagnetic theory in the determination of space dimensionality is stressed.
Keywords space  dimensionality  epistemology  Ehrenfest  stability arguments
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Answers in Search of a Question: ‘Proofs’ of the Tri-Dimensionality of Space.Craig Callender - 2005 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36 (1):113-136.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On the Reality of Minkowski Space.Vesselin Petkov - 2007 - Foundations of Physics 37 (10):1499-1502.
Comments on the Dimensionality of Time.R. Mirman - 1973 - Foundations of Physics 3 (3):321-333.
Dimensionality, Orientability and the Ontological Status of Space.Richard Olin Frame - 1990 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Life in Configuration Space.Peter J. Lewis - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (4):713-729.
The Geometry of State Space.M. Adelman, J. V. Corbett & C. A. Hurst - 1993 - Foundations of Physics 23 (2):211-223.
Cosmological Special Relativity.M. Carmeli - 1996 - Foundations of Physics 26 (3):413-416.
Causality Implies Formal State Collapse.George Svetlichny - 2003 - Foundations of Physics 33 (4):641-655.


Added to PP index

Total views
206 ( #52,268 of 2,463,159 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #33,142 of 2,463,159 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes