Journal of Business Ethics 11 (2):95 - 104 (1992)
The pressure for publication is ever present in academe. Rules for submission are elucidated by conferences, proceedings and journals for the benefit of authors; however, the rules for reviewers and editors are not so well established or consistent. This treatise examines examples of abuse of the editorial process and points to a need for formal recognition of rules for review. The manuscript culminates with proposed Codes of Ethics for researchers, referees and editors and suggestions for improvement of the peer review process.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Peer-Review Practices of Psychological Journals: The Fate of Published Articles, Submitted Again.Douglas P. Peters & Stephen J. Ceci - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):187-195.
Publication, Politics, and Scientific Progress.Michael J. Mahoney - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):220.
Reviewer “Bias”: Do Peters and Ceci Protest Too Much?Daniel Perlman - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):231.
Rejecting Published Work: Similar Fate for Fiction.Chuck Ross - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):236.
Peer-Review Research: Objections and Obligations.Douglas P. Peters & Stephen J. Ceci - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):246.
Citations of this work BETA
Evaluating the Pros and Cons of Different Peer Review Policies Via Simulation.Jia Zhu, Gabriel Fung, Wai Hung Wong, Zhixu Li & Chuanhua Xu - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (4):1073-1094.
Corruption and Representations of Scholarly Output.Robert Liebler - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (3):259-269.
Similar books and articles
Exploring Why and How Journal Editors Retract Articles: Findings From a Qualitative Study.Peter Williams & Elizabeth Wager - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (1):1-11.
Promoting F.A.I.T.H. In Peer Review: Five Core Attributes of Effective Peer Review. [REVIEW]Leigh Turner - 2003 - Journal of Academic Ethics 1 (2):181-188.
Ethics and the Accounting Publishing Process: Author, Reviewer, and Editor Issues. [REVIEW]Susan C. Borkowski & Mary Jeanne Welsh - 1998 - Journal of Business Ethics 17 (16):1785-1803.
Ethical Practice in the Accounting Publishing Process: Contrasting Opinions of Authors and Editors. [REVIEW]Susan C. Borkowski & Mary Jeanne Welsh - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 25 (1):15 - 31.
Should Biomedical Publishing Be “Opened Up”? Toward a Values-Based Peer-Review Process.Wendy Lipworth, Ian Kerridge, Stacy Carter & Miles Little - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (3):267-280.
The Tragedy of the Common Reviewers: The Peer Review Process.Ulysses Paulino De Albuquerque - unknown
Referees, Editors, and Publication Practices: Improving the Reliability and Usefulness of the Peer Review System.Domenic V. Cicchetti - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):51-62.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #329,667 of 2,158,277 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #65,070 of 2,158,277 )
How can I increase my downloads?