Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (2):269-294 (2008)
AbstractMany contemporary scholars debate whether war should be conceived as a relative evil or a morally neutral act. The works of Augustine may offer new ways of thinking through the categories of this debate. In an early period, Augustine develops the distinction between evil done and evil suffered. Augustine's early treatments of war locate the saint as detached sage doing only good, and immune from evil suffered. In a middle period, he develops a richer picture of the evil suffered on the occasion of the loss of historical goods but fails to develop the implications of this picture as concerns war. Finally, without abandoning emphasis on the avoidance of doing evil, Augustine comes to highlight how evil suffered in war prevents us from speaking simply of good wars. Augustine's ability to hold together senses of evil and their moral significance provides a useful avenue for new thought on this issue
Similar books and articles
The Cosmos as a Work of Art.Alexander Pruss - 2020 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 94:205-213.
The Elements of St. Augustine's Just War Theory.John Langan - 1984 - Journal of Religious Ethics 12 (1):19 - 38.
Augustine on Sin and Moral Agency.William S. Babcock - 1988 - Journal of Religious Ethics 16 (1):28-55.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Just Lies: Finding Augustine's Ethics of Public Lying in His Treatments of Lying and Killing.David Decosimo - 2010 - Journal of Religious Ethics 38 (4):661-697.
Just War and Virtue: Revisiting Augustine and Thomas Aquinas.Nico Vorster - 2015 - South African Journal of Philosophy 34 (1):55-68.
References found in this work
Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions.Martha C. Nussbaum - 2001 - Cambridge University Press.
The Just War: Force and Political Responsibility.Paul Ramsey & Stanley Hauerwas - 1991 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.