Pascal's Wager

In Steven M. Cahn & David Shatz (eds.), Philosophy. Oxford University Press. pp. 250- (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX


A. Pascal's statement of his wager argument is couched in terms of the theory of probability and the theory of games, and the exposition is unclear and unnecessarily complicated. The following is a ‘creative’ reformulation of the argument designed to avoid some of the objections which have been or might be raised against the original



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,662

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Pascal's Wager.Alan Hájek - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
On Rescher on Pascal's Wager.Graham Oppy - 1991 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 30 (3):159 - 168.
Pascal's Wager is a Possible Bet (but Not a Very Good One): Reply to Harmon Holcomb III.Graham Oppy - 1996 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 40 (2):101 - 116.


Added to PP

91 (#133,769)

6 months
1 (#420,432)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Surreal Decisions.Eddy Keming Chen & Daniel Rubio - 2020 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 100 (1):54-74.
Wagering Against Divine Hiddenness.Elizabeth Jackson - 2016 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 8 (4):85-108.
Pascal, Pascalberg, and Friends.Samuel Lebens - 2020 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 87 (1):109-130.
The Nature and Rationality of Conversion.Paul Faulkner - 2019 - European Journal of Philosophy 27 (4):821-836.

View all 10 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Pascal: His Life and Works.Jean Mesnard - 1952 - [New York]Philosophical Library.
Pascal.Jean Steinmann - 1966 - London: Burns & Oates.
Le pari de Pascal.Georges Brunet - 1957 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 12 (2):235-235.

Add more references