Review: Longuenesse, Kant on the Human Standpoint [Book Review]


Authors
Emily Carson
McGill University
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,223
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reply to the Comments of Longuenesse and Ginsborg.Henry Allison - 2003 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):182 – 194.
Kant's "I Think" Versus Descartes' "I Am a Thing That Thinks".Béatrice Longuenesse - 2008 - In Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse (eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton University Press. pp. 9--31.
Introduction.Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse - 2008 - In Daniel Garber & Béatrice Longuenesse (eds.), Kant and the Early Moderns. Princeton University Press. pp. 1-8.
Cassam and Kant on "How Possible" Questions and Categorial Thinking.Beatrice Longuenesse - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (2):510-517.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
38 ( #237,197 of 2,285,692 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #837,842 of 2,285,692 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature