Safety and Dream Scepticism in Sosa’s Epistemology

Synthese (6) (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX


A common objection to Sosa’s epistemology is that it countenances, in an objectionable way, unsafe knowledge. This objection, under closer inspection, turns out to be in far worse shape than Sosa’s critics have realised. Sosa and his defenders have offered two central response types to the idea that allowing unsafe knowledge is problematic: one response type adverts to the animal/reflective knowledge distinction that is characteristic of bi-level virtue epistemology. The other less-discussed response type appeals to the threat of dream scepticism, and in particular, to the idea that many of our everyday perceptual beliefs are unsafe through the nearness of the dream possibility. The latter dreaming response to the safety objection to Sosa’s virtue epistemology has largely flown under the radar in contemporary discussions of safety and knowledge. We think that, suitably articulated in view of research in the philosophy and science of dreaming, it has much more going for it than has been appreciated. This paper further develops, beyond what Sosa does himself, the dreaming argument in response to those who think safety (as traditionally understood) is a condition on knowledge and who object to Sosa’s account on the grounds that it fails this condition. The payoffs of further developing this argument will be not only a better understanding of the importance of insights about dreaming against safety as a condition on knowledge, but also some reason to think a weaker safety condition, one that is relativised to SSS (i.e., skill/shape/situation) conditions for competence exercise, gets better results all things considered as an anti-luck codicil on knowledge.

Similar books and articles

Sosa on scepticism. [REVIEW]Jessica Brown - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 143 (3):397--405.
Virtue Epistemology.John Turri & Ernest Sosa - 2013 - In Byron Kaldis (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy and the Social Sciences. Los Angeles: Sage Publications. pp. 427-440.
A Virtue Epistemology.Ernest Sosa - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 143 (3):427-440.
Need knowing and acting be SSS‐Safe?Jaakko Hirvelä & Niall Paterson - 2021 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 10 (2):127-134.
Review: Sosa on Scepticism. [REVIEW]Jessica Brown - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 143 (3):397 - 405.
Safety, Virtue, Scepticism: Remarks on Sosa.Peter Baumann - 2015 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy (45):295-306.
Unsafe Knowledge.Juan Comesaña - 2005 - Synthese 146 (3):395-404.
Dreams, agency, and judgement.Matthew Soteriou - 2017 - Synthese 197 (12):5319-5334.
Sosa on skepticism.Otávio Bueno - 2009 - Metaphilosophy 40 (2):195-202.
Safety in Sosa.John Greco - 2018 - Synthese 197 (12):5147-5157.


Added to PP

193 (#18,259)

6 months
193 (#103,797)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

J. Adam Carter
University of Glasgow
Robert Cowan
University of Glasgow

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Epistemic Luck.Duncan Pritchard - 2005 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
Sense and Sensibilia.John Langshaw Austin - 1962 - Oxford University Press. Edited by G. Warnock.
The Problems of Philosophy.Bertrand Russell - 1912 - Portland, OR: Home University Library.
Knowledge and Its Limits.Timothy Williamson - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (2):452-458.
How to defeat opposition to Moore.Ernest Sosa - 1999 - Philosophical Perspectives 13:137-49.

View all 27 references / Add more references