Science as instrumental reason: Heidegger, Habermas, Heisenberg [Book Review]

Continental Philosophy Review 42 (4):483-509 (2010)

Abstract
In modern continental thought, natural science is widely portrayed as an exclusively instrumental mode of reason. The breadth of this consensus has partly preempted the question of how it came to persuade. The process of persuasion, as it played out in Germany, can be explored by reconstructing the intellectual exchanges among three twentieth-century theorists of science, Heidegger, Habermas, and Werner Heisenberg. Taking an iconic Heisenberg as a kind of limiting case of “the scientist,” Heidegger and Habermas each found themselves driven to place new constraints on their previously more capacious assessments of science, especially its capacity to reflect on its method. Tracing how that happened, through archival and historical contextualization and close readings of their texts, lets us make visible Heidegger and Habermas’s intellectual affinities and argumentative parallels, which derived not only from their shared grounding in earlier reactions against positivism, but also from confrontation with contemporary events. The latter included, for Heidegger, the rise of a technically powerful science exemplified by nuclear physics, and for Habermas, post-World War II controversies over science, technology, and their socially critical possibilities
Keywords Martin Heidegger  Jürgen Habermas  Werner Heisenberg  Instrumental rationality  Science  Positivism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11007-009-9124-y
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,062
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Knowledge and Human Interests.Jürgen Habermas - 1978 - Heinemann Educational.
Erkenntnis Und Interesse.Jürgen Habermas - 2008 - Felix Meiner Verlag.

View all 43 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Scope and Multidimensionality of the Scientific Realism Debate.Howard Sankey & Dimitri Ginev - 2011 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 42 (2):263-283.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-12-09

Total views
195 ( #32,080 of 2,320,293 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #88,206 of 2,320,293 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature