The argument from biogenesis: Probabilities against a natural origin of life [Book Review]

Biology and Philosophy 19 (5):739-764 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No evidence exists that the accidental origin of life is too improbable to have occurred naturally, but there are numerous attempts to argue so. Dizzying statistics are cited to show that a god had to be responsible. This paper identifies the Argument from Biogenesis, then explains why all these arguments so far fail, and what would actually have to be done to make such an argument succeed. Describes seven general types of error, with examples. Includes a table of forty-seven statistics used by over twenty authors to date.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
144 (#125,931)

6 months
8 (#341,144)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Thermodynamical Arguments Against Evolution.Jason Rosenhouse - 2017 - Science & Education 26 (1-2):3-25.
On Mathematical Anti-Evolutionism.Jason Rosenhouse - 2016 - Science & Education 25 (1-2):95-114.
How the discovery of ribozymes cast RNA in the roles of both chicken and egg in origin-of-life theories.Neeraja Sankaran - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (4):741-750.

Add more citations