True, false, paranormal and 'designated'?: A reply to Jenkins

Analysis 68 (299):238–244 (2008)
Jenkins (2007) charges that the language advanced in Beall (2007) is either expressively impoverished, or inconsistent. We argue that Jenkins’ objections are based on unreasonably strong constraints on formal theories of truth. Our primary concern is not to defend the ‘paranormal’ framework advanced in Beall, but to respond to a common – and implausible – ‘revenge’-style charge directed at a certain class of formal theories of truth and paradox.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2012
DOI 10.1093/analys/68.3.238
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,422
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Lionel Shapiro (2011). Expressibility and the Liar's Revenge. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (2):297-314.
Aaron J. Cotnoir (2012). Validity for Strong Pluralists. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 86 (3):563-579.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

49 ( #99,375 of 1,924,955 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #187,166 of 1,924,955 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.