Authors
Marcelo E. Coniglio
University of Campinas
Walter Carnielli
University of Campinas
Abstract
Boolean-valued models of set theory were independently introduced by Scott, Solovay and Vopěnka in 1965, offering a natural and rich alternative for describing forcing. The original method was adapted by Takeuti, Titani, Kozawa and Ozawa to lattice-valued models of set theory. After this, Löwe and Tarafder proposed a class of algebras based on a certain kind of implication which satisfy several axioms of ZF. From this class, they found a specific 3-valued model called PS3 which satisfies all the axioms of ZF, and can be expanded with a paraconsistent negation *, thus obtaining a paraconsistent model of ZF. The logic (PS3 ,*) coincides (up to language) with da Costa and D'Ottaviano logic J3, a 3-valued paraconsistent logic that have been proposed independently in the literature by several authors and with different motivations such as CluNs, LFI1 and MPT. We propose in this paper a family of algebraic models of ZFC based on LPT0, another linguistic variant of J3 introduced by us in 2016. The semantics of LPT0, as well as of its first-order version QLPT0, is given by twist structures defined over Boolean agebras. From this, it is possible to adapt the standard Boolean-valued models of (classical) ZFC to twist-valued models of an expansion of ZFC by adding a paraconsistent negation. We argue that the implication operator of LPT0 is more suitable for a paraconsistent set theory than the implication of PS3, since it allows for genuinely inconsistent sets w such that [(w = w)] = 1/2 . This implication is not a 'reasonable implication' as defined by Löwe and Tarafder. This suggests that 'reasonable implication algebras' are just one way to define a paraconsistent set theory. Our twist-valued models are adapted to provide a class of twist-valued models for (PS3,*), thus generalizing Löwe and Tarafder result. It is shown that they are in fact models of ZFC (not only of ZF).
Keywords Paraconsistent set theory  Set theory  Paraconsistency  Boolean-valued models  Twist-structures semantics  Logics of formal inconsistency
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Models for a Paraconsistent Set Theory.Thierry Libert - 2005 - Journal of Applied Logic 3 (1):15-41.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Ideal Paraconsistent Logics.O. Arieli, A. Avron & A. Zamansky - 2011 - Studia Logica 99 (1-3):31-60.
Heyting-Valued Interpretations for Constructive Set Theory.Nicola Gambino - 2006 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 137 (1):164-188.
Orthomodular-Valued Models for Quantum Set Theory.Masanao Ozawa - 2017 - Review of Symbolic Logic 10 (4):782-807.
N-Valued Maximal Paraconsistent Matrices.Adam Trybus - 2019 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 29 (2):171-183.
On an Algebra of Lattice-Valued Logic.Lars Hansen - 2005 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 70 (1):282-318.
On an Algebra of Lattice-Valued Logic.Lars Hansen - 2005 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 70 (1):282 - 318.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-12-05

Total views
75 ( #126,607 of 2,348,456 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #34,166 of 2,348,456 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes