Philosophical Papers 35 (2):205-229 (2006)
This article argues that, suitably modified, the method of reflective equilibrium is a plausible way of selecting moral principles. The appropriate conception of the method is wide and radical, admitting consideration of a full range of moral principles and arguments, and requiring the enquiring individual to consider others' views and undergo experiences that may offset any formative biases. The individual is not bound by his initial considered judgments, and may revise his view in any way whatsoever. It is appropriate to describe the method as a balance between coherentism and fallibilist foundationalism. With these points in mind, various criticisms, including the claims that considered judgments are not initially credible and are shaped by prejudice, and that the method itself fails to determine principle selection, are challenged.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory.Alasdair C. MacIntyre - 2007 - University of Notre Dame Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Theoretical and Practical Problems with Wide Reflective Equilibrium in Bioethics.Carson Strong - 2010 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 31 (2):123-140.
Rational Consensus and Coherence Methods in Ethics.Elvio Baccarini - 1991 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 40:151-159.
Wide Reflective Equilibrium as a Method of Justification in Bioethics.Peter Nichols - 2012 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33 (5):325-341.
The Evidential Weight of Considered Moral Judgments.Christopher Michael Cloos - 2009 - Dissertation, San Jose State University
Grounding Rights and a Method of Reflective Equilibrium.Kai Nielsen - 1982 - Inquiry 25 (3):277 – 306.
The Amoralist Objection and the Method of Moral Reasoning.Matej Sušnik - 2009 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 9 (1):91-100.
The Old Problem of Induction and the New Reflective Equilibrium.Jared Bates - 2005 - Dialectica 59 (3):347–356.
Reflective Equilibrium and Methodology of Science.Elvio Baccarini - 1992 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 6 (3):175 – 180.
The Role Played by the Method of Wide Reflective Equilibrium in Moral Epistemology.Christine Swanton - 1991 - Dialogue 30 (04):575-.
Moral Judgments and the Analytic/Synthetic Distinction.Jennifer McCrickerd - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Research 26:423-433.
Wide Reflective Equilibrium as an Answer to an Objection to Moral Heuristics.Edward Stein - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):561-562.
Is Reflective Equilibrium Enough?Thomas Kelly & Sarah McGrath - 2010 - Philosophical Perspectives 24 (1):325-359.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads102 ( #49,105 of 2,164,001 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #51,038 of 2,164,001 )
How can I increase my downloads?