The objectification of human phenomena: observations in the light of Winnicott and Heidegger /A objetificação dos fenômenos humanos: um olhar à luz de Winnicott e Heidegger

Natureza Humana 17 (1):58-73 (2015)

Abstract
In The Age of the World Picture, philosopher Martin Heidegger claims that scientific representations do not reduce themselves to pure appropriations of what they present. Rather, they convey investigations that confine being to rules of appropriation. Those rules govern how natural science accesses phenomena. The choice of natural science as the predominant mode of representation of reality entails what Heidegger calls a process of objectification (Vergegenständlichung). In his Zollikon Seminars, Heidegger questions the tribute paid by the sciences of the mind to the logic of the natural sciences, and stresses that Freud, by thinking of the mind as a machine driven by instinctive powers, assigns to human phenomena the objective features set by the natural sciences. This paper purports to show that Winnicott, by formulating a theory of personal maturing, disagrees with the objectifying requirements of the natural sciences. For Winnicott, traditional psychoanalysis uses categories that are inadequate for describing the changes babies undergo in the environment that gives them care and attention, because its analysis is confined to the field of libido relations. With that in mind, it is not possible to speak about human maturation processes using an objectifying language; Winnicott stresses (in The newborn and his mother) that “I cannot sacrifice a patient on the altar of science”. This paper argues that Winnicott disagrees with the naturalistic imperative, which reduces the real to what is objective and places physics as a model for the sciences. The paper also broaches on the issue of how far the considerations of Heidegger and Winnicott regarding access to human phenomena allow us to discuss the current overwhelming process of medicating everyday life.
Keywords objectification  Heidegger  Winnicott
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

As duas metafísicas de Kant.Zeljko Loparic - 2003 - Kant E-Prints 2 (5):1-10.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Individuality, Deliberation and Welfare in Donald Winnicott.Gal Gerson - 2005 - History of the Human Sciences 18 (1):107-126.
Reading Winnicott.Lesley Caldwell & Angela Joyce (eds.) - 2011 - Routledge.
Winnicott, Symbolic Play, and Other Minds.Somogy Varga - 2011 - Philosophical Psychology 24 (5):625 - 637.
The Mania of Existence: Klein, Winnicott, and Heidegger's Concept of Inauthenticity.Beau Shaw - 2015 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 46 (1):48-60.
A noção de trauma em Freud e Winnicott.Leopoldo Fulgencio - 2004 - Natureza Humana 6 (2):255-270.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-03-21

Total views
163 ( #42,726 of 2,242,826 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
54 ( #11,212 of 2,242,826 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature