Journal of Business Ethics 17 (5):543-555 (1998)

Abstract
Investment in financially distressed companies has taken place since the end of the depression. But a new breed of predatory activist investors called "vultures" has emerged in recent years. They take sizable debt positions in insolvent companies with the intention of significantly increasing the value of their investment through aggressive negotiation either in bankruptcy or in pre-bankruptcy restructurings. Predators thrive on adversarial conflict. Vulture investment is legal, but is it morally acceptable? This paper argues that the strategies and tactics of vultures may be very unpleasant, but in themselves these are insufficient grounds for moral censure.
Keywords Philosophy   Ethics   Business Education   Economic Growth   Management
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/a:1005718715162
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 52,956
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Support for Investor Activism Among U.K. Ethical Investors.Alan Lewis & Craig Mackenzie - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 24 (3):215 - 222.
Healthy Investments in Investing in Health.Derek Yach - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 33 (3):191 - 198.
E-Commerce, Ethical Commerce?Mary D. Maury & Deborah S. Kleiner - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 36 (1-2):21 - 31.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
26 ( #381,395 of 2,343,995 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #514,126 of 2,343,995 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes