Routledge (2019)

Authors
Patrick Bondy
Wichita State University
J. Adam Carter
University of Glasgow
Abstract
Epistemological theories of knowledge and justification draw a crucial distinction between one's simply havinggood reasons for some belief, and one's actually basingone's belief on good reasons. While the most natural kind of account of basing is causal in nature--a belief is based on a reason if and only if the belief is properly caused by the reason--there is hardly any widely-accepted, counterexample-free account of the basing relation among contemporary epistemologists. Further inquiry into the nature of the basing relation is therefore of paramount importance for epistemology. Without an acceptable account of the basing relation, epistemological theories remain both crucially incomplete and vulnerable to errors that can arise when authors assume an implausible view of what it takes for beliefs to be held on the basis of reasons. Well-Founded Beliefbrings together seventeen essays written by leading epistemologists to explore this important topic in greater detail. The collection is divided thematically to cover a wide range of issues related to the epistemic basic relation. The first section of essays covers the nature of the basing relation and attempts to articulate defensible accounts of what it takes to believe on the basis of a reason. Section II explores the kind of things that can be reasons on the basis of which we hold beliefs. Finally, the last section addresses the basing relation as it bears on particular problems in epistemology, such as skepticism, the analysis of knowledge, and the contingencies of our epistemic upbringing.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2019
Buy this book Find it on Amazon.com
ISBN(s) 9781138503755   9781315145518   9781032337333   1138503754
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,214
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
Chapters BETA

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Problems of Religious Luck: Assessing the Limits of Reasonable Religious Disagreement.Guy Axtell - 2019 - Lanham, MD, USA & London, UK: Lexington Books/Rowman & Littlefield.
Epistemic Autonomy and Externalism.J. Adam Carter - 2020 - In Kirk Lougheed & Jonathan Matheson (eds.), Epistemic Autonomy. London: Routledge.
On Believing Indirectly for Practical Reasons.Sebastian Schmidt - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 179 (6):1795-1819.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Counterfactuals and Epistemic Basing Relations.Patrick Bondy - 2016 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (4):542-569.
The Problem of the Basing Relation.Ian Evans - 2013 - Synthese 190 (14):2943-2957.
Basing for the Bayesian.Cameron Gibbs - 2019 - Synthese 196 (9):3815-3840.
The Epistemic Basing Relation.Keith Allen Korcz - 1996 - Dissertation, The Ohio State University
Triangulation, Content and the Basing Relation.Hamid Vahid - 2009 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 78 (1):231-250.
The Peculiar Case of Lehrer’s Lawyer.Kevin Wallbridge - 2018 - Synthese 195 (4):1615-1630.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-08-23

Total views
6 ( #1,133,688 of 2,507,652 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,871 of 2,507,652 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes