- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Assessing communication strategies in argumentation-based negotiation agents equipped with belief revision1
Argument and Computation 7 (2-3):175-200 (2016)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Persuasive argumentation in negotiation.Katia P. Sycara - 1990 - Theory and Decision 28 (3):203-242.
Negotiation and Defeasible Decision Making.Fernando Tohmé - 2002 - Theory and Decision 53 (4):289-311.
Building intercultural alliances: a study of moves and strategies in initial business negotiation meetings.Yunxia Zhu - 2011 - .
Probabilistic rule-based argumentation for norm-governed learning agents.Régis Riveret, Antonino Rotolo & Giovanni Sartor - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 20 (4):383-420.
The Agentive Approach to Argumentation. Nino - 2015 - In Frans Hendrik van Eemeren & Bart Garssen (eds.), Reflections on Theoretical Issues in Argumentation Theory. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. pp. 53-67.
Communication, credibility and negotiation using a cognitive hierarchy model.Matthew Stone - unknown
Neither Naïve nor Critical Reconstruction: Dispute Mediators, Impasse, and the Design of Argumentation.Mark Aakhus - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (3):265-290.
Using conversation policies to solve problems of ambiguity in argumentation and artificial intelligence.Douglas N. Walton - 2006 - Pragmatics and Cognition 14 (1):3-36.
Negotiation and Deliberation: Grasping the Difference.Constanza Ihnen Jory - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (2):145-165.
Rules for argumentation in dialogues.Frans H. Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (4):499-510.
Seeing is believing.B. van Linder, W. van der Hoek & J.-J. Ch Meyer - 1997 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 6 (1):33-61.
The Fallaciousness of Threats: Character and Ad Baculum .F. Macagno & D. Walton - 2007 - Argumentation 28 (3):203-228.
Persuasion dialogue in online dispute resolution.Douglas Walton & David M. Godden - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (2):273-295.
An Agent View on Law.Heesen Constantijn, Homburg Vincent & Offereins Margriet - 1997 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 5 (4):323-340.
Analytics
Added to PP
2018-07-25
Downloads
7 (#1,316,802)
6 months
6 (#431,022)
2018-07-25
Downloads
7 (#1,316,802)
6 months
6 (#431,022)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions.Carlos E. Alchourrón, Peter Gärdenfors & David Makinson - 1985 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 (2):510-530.
Multiple kernel contraction.Eduardo Fermé, Karina Saez & Pablo Sanz - 2003 - Studia Logica 73 (2):183 - 195.
Multiple Kernel Contraction.Eduardo Fermé, Karina Saez & Pablo Sanz - 2003 - Studia Logica 73 (2):183-195.
An argumentation-based approach for reasoning about trust in information sources.Leila Amgoud & Robert Demolombe - 2014 - Argument and Computation 5 (2-3):191-215.
Agent planning programs.Giuseppe De Giacomo, Alfonso Emilio Gerevini, Fabio Patrizi, Alessandro Saetti & Sebastian Sardina - 2016 - Artificial Intelligence 231 (C):64-106.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-l2pxr uwo