A Problem of Unity in St. Thomas’s Account of Human Action

New Scholasticism 61 (2):146-161 (1987)
Abstract
In his many and varied writings, St Thomas presents us with both a sophisticated account of human action and a complicated moral theory. In this article, I shall be considering the question of whether St Thomas’s theory of action and his moral theory are mutually consistent. My claim shall be that St Thomas can preserve the ontological unity of human action—but only at the cost of rendering it extremely difficult to evaluate in a manner consistent with his moral theory, or, alternatively, that he can provide a viable ethical analysis of human action—but only at the cost of compromising its ontological unity. In the first section of this article I shall examine St Thomas’s account of a particular kind of moral action, namely lying. Two basic questions concerning the specificity of unicity of human action will emerge from this examination: 1) what makes an act to be a specific moral act?, and 2) what makes a specific moral act to be one act? In the second section of the article I shall attempt to show, by means of a textual examination, that St Thomas does not appear to be able to provide an account of human action that will satisfactorily answer both these basic questions at the same time.
Keywords Catholic Tradition  History of Philosophy  Philosophy and Religion
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0028-6621
DOI 10.5840/newscholas198761221
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,300
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Berkeley's Immaterialist Account of Action.Patrick Fleming - 2006 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (3):415-429.
A Puzzle Regarding Reid's Theory of Motives.Terence Cuneo - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (5):963-981.
The Concept of a Human Action.Anfinn Stigen - 1970 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 13 (1-4):1 – 31.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
28 ( #187,955 of 2,193,284 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #290,647 of 2,193,284 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature