Foundations of Physics 49 (10):1200-1230 (2019)
Authors | |
Abstract |
The usual representation of quantum algorithms is limited to the process of solving the problem. We extend it to the process of setting the problem. Bob, the problem setter, selects a problem-setting by the initial measurement. Alice, the problem solver, unitarily computes the corresponding solution and reads it by the final measurement. This simple extension creates a new perspective from which to see the quantum algorithm. First, it highlights the relevance of time-symmetric quantum mechanics to quantum computation: the problem-setting and problem solution, in their quantum version, constitute pre- and post-selection, hence the process as a whole is bound to be affected by both boundary conditions. Second, it forces us to enter into relational quantum mechanics. There must be a representation of the quantum algorithm with respect to Bob, and another one with respect to Alice, from whom the outcome of the initial measurement, specifying the setting and thus the solution of the problem, must be concealed. Time-symmetrizing the quantum algorithm to take into account both boundary conditions leaves the representation to Bob unaltered. It shows that the representation to Alice is a sum over histories in each of which she remains shielded from the information coming to her from the initial measurement, not from that coming to her backwards in time from the final measurement. In retrospect, all is as if she knew in advance, before performing her problem-solving action, half of the information that specifies the solution of the problem she will read in the future and could use this information to reach the solution with fewer computation steps. This elucidates the quantum computational speedup in all the quantum algorithms examined.
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s10701-019-00300-z |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Completing the Physical Representation of Quantum Algorithms Provides a Quantitative Explanation of Their Computational Speedup.Giuseppe Castagnoli - 2018 - Foundations of Physics 48 (3):333-354.
The Elusive Source of Quantum Speedup.Vlatko Vedral - 2010 - Foundations of Physics 40 (8):1141-1154.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
A Relational Time-Symmetric Framework for Analyzing the Quantum Computational Speedup.G. Castagnoli, E. Cohen, A. K. Ekert & A. C. Elitzur - 2019 - Foundations of Physics 49 (10):1200-1230.
Highlighting the Mechanism of the Quantum Speedup by Time-Symmetric and Relational Quantum Mechanics.Giuseppe Castagnoli - 2016 - Foundations of Physics 46 (3):360-381.
Completing the Physical Representation of Quantum Algorithms Provides a Quantitative Explanation of Their Computational Speedup.Giuseppe Castagnoli - 2018 - Foundations of Physics 48 (3):333-354.
On the Necessity of Entanglement for the Explanation of Quantum Speedup.Michael Cuffaro - manuscript
From Micro to Macro: A Solution to the Measurement Problem of Quantum Mechanics.Jeffrey Bub - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:134 - 144.
Does the Minimal Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Resolve the Measurement Problem?Nicholas Maxwell - 1975 - Methodology and Science 8:84-101.
Is Measurement a Black Box? On the Importance of Understanding Measurement Even in Quantum Information and Computation.Michael Dickson - 2007 - Philosophy of Science 74 (5):1019–1032.
Quantum Information - What Price Realism?Amit Hagar - 2005 - Intl. J. Of Quantum Information 3 (1):165-170.
Relational Physics with Real Rods and Clocks and the Measurement Problem of Quantum Mechanics.Rodolfo Gambini & Jorge Pullin - 2007 - Foundations of Physics 37 (7):1074-1092.
A New Look at the Quantum Mechanical Problem of Measurement.Nicholas Maxwell - 1972 - American Journal of Physics 40:1431-5..
A Final Solution to the Mind-Body Problem by Quantum Language.Shiro Ishikawa - 2017 - Journal of Quantum Information Science 7:140-154.
“Incerto Tempore, Incertisque Loci”: Can We Compute the Exact Time at Which a Quantum Measurement Happens? [REVIEW]Carlo Rovelli - 1998 - Foundations of Physics 28 (7):1031-1043.
The Measurement Problem in Quantum Mechanics.Alessio Giuseppe Ferraioli & Canio Noce - 2019 - Science and Philosophy 7 (1):41-58.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2019-12-21
Total views
3 ( #1,278,591 of 2,402,091 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #552,323 of 2,402,091 )
2019-12-21
Total views
3 ( #1,278,591 of 2,402,091 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #552,323 of 2,402,091 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads