Articulating the A Priori-A Posteriori Distinction

In Essays on A Priori Knowledge and Justification. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press. pp. 289-327 (2012)

Authors
Albert Casullo
University of Nebraska, Lincoln
Abstract
The distinction between a priori knowledge and a posteriori knowledge has come under attack in the recent literature by Philip Kitcher, John Hawthorne, C. S. Jenkins, and Timothy Williamson. Evaluating the attacks requires answering two questions. First, have they hit their target? Second, are they compelling? My goal is to argue that the attacks fail because they miss their target. Since the attacks are directed at a particular concept or distinction, they must accurately locate the target concept or distinction. Accurately locating the target concept or distinction requires correctly articulating that concept or distinction. The attacks miss their target because they fail to correctly articulate the target concept or distinction. I go on to present a different challenge to the a priori-a posteriori distinction. This challenge is not directed at the coherence or significance of the distinction. Its target is the traditional view that all knowledge (or justified belief) is either a priori or a posteriori.
Keywords a priori, a posteriori, distinction, knowledge, concept, Kitcher, Hawthorne, Jenkins, Williamson.
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2012
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Why Nearly Everything Is Knowable A Priori.Brian Cutter - forthcoming - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

13. On the Characterization of the Weak-Strong Distinction1.Helen De Hoop - 1995 - In Emmon Bach, Eloise Jelinek, Angelika Kratzer & Barbara Partee (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 421.
An Analysis of the a Priori and a Posteriori.Jeremy Fantl - 2003 - Acta Analytica 18 (1-2):43-69.
A Priori and a Posteriori.Jason S. Baehr - 2003 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Necessary a Posteriori Truth.Richard Swinburne - 1991 - American Philosophical Quarterly 28 (2):113 - 123.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-06-21

Total views
152 ( #56,050 of 2,310,674 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
47 ( #15,602 of 2,310,674 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature