Philosophical Studies 100 (3):217-236 (2000)
Considering topology as an extension of mereology, this paper analyses topological variants of mereological essentialism (the thesis that an object could not have different parts than the ones it has). In particular, we examine de dicto and de re versions of two theses: (i) that an object cannot change its external connections (e.g., adjacent objects cannot be separated), and (ii) that an object cannot change its topological genus (e.g., a doughnut cannot turn into a sphere). Stronger forms of structural essentialism, such as morphological essentialism (an object cannot change shape) and locative essentialism (an object cannot change position) are also examined.
|Keywords||Mereology Mereotopology Essentialism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Expressivity in Polygonal, Plane Mereotopology.Ian Pratt & Dominik Schoop - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (2):822-838.
Reasoning About Space: The Hole Story.Achille C. Varzi - 1996 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 4:3-39.
Spatial Entities.Roberto Casati & Achille C. Varzi - 1997 - In Oliviero Stock (ed.), Spatial and Temporal Reasoning. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 73–96.
Dispositional Essentialism and the Necessity of Laws.Robin Findlay Hendry & Darrell P. Rowbottom - 2009 - Analysis 69 (4):668-677.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads158 ( #29,194 of 2,163,853 )
Recent downloads (6 months)17 ( #19,683 of 2,163,853 )
How can I increase my downloads?