Abstract
In this essay, some of the signatories to “Medical Intervention in Cases of Maternal–Fetal Vital Conflicts: A Statement of Consensus” respond to “The Placenta as an Organ of the Fetus: A Response to the Statement of Consensus on Maternal–Fetal Conflict,” both recently published in this journal. The response examines Bringman and Shabanowitz’s claims and assumptions about the morally relevant pathologic condition in some cases of peripartum cardiomyopathy complicated by a subsequent pregnancy, the moral status of a normally functioning placenta, and the use of the principle of double effect in these cases. The signatories’ response sets out to demonstrate how Bringman and Shabanowitz do not engage the essential points of the statement of consensus and how their argument is premised on false assumptions. National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 15.2 : 241–250.
Keywords Applied Philosophy  Business and Professional Ethics  Catholic Tradition
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1532-5490
DOI 10.5840/ncbq201515228
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,130
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Metaphysical Status of the Placenta.Becket Gremmels, Peter J. Cataldo, Elliott Louis Bedford & Cornelia R. Graves - 2014 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 14 (2):295-333.
Maternal–Fetal Conflicts: Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request.Ruth Landau & Steve Yentis - 2010 - In G. A. van Norman, S. Jackson, S. H. Rosenbaum & S. K. Palmer (eds.), Clinical Ethics in Anesthesiology. Cambridge University Press. pp. 49.
The Case of Medea--A View of Fetal-Maternal Conflict.M. C. Reid & G. Gillett - 1997 - Journal of Medical Ethics 23 (1):19-25.
Hooked Up.Tanya N. Cook - 2012 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 16 (1):45-61.
Fetal-Maternal Conflicts.Holly Smith - 1994 - In Allen Buchanan & Jules Coleman (eds.), In Harm's Way: Essays in Honor of Joel Feinberg. Cambridge University Press.
The Maternal‐Fetal Dyad.Susan S. Mattingly - 1992 - Hastings Center Report 22 (1):13-18.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-06-30

Total views
28 ( #408,344 of 2,506,501 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,726 of 2,506,501 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes