Socio-economic research on genetically modified crops: a study of the literature

Agriculture and Human Values 35 (2):489-513 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The importance of socio-economic impacts from the introduction and use of genetically modified crops is reflected in increasing efforts to include them in regulatory frameworks. Aiming to identify and understand the present knowledge on SEI of GM crops, we here report the findings from an extensive study of the published international scientific peer-reviewed literature. After applying specified selection criteria, a total of 410 articles are analysed. The main findings include: limited empirical research on SEI of GM crops in the scientific literature; the main focus of the majority of the published research is on a restricted set of monetary economic parameters; proportionally, there are very few empirical studies on social and non-monetary economic aspects; most of the research reports only short-term findings; the variable local contexts and conditions are generally ignored in research methodology and analysis; conventional agriculture is the commonly used comparator, with minimal consideration of other substantially different agricultural systems; and there is the overall tendency to frame the research upon not validated theoretical assumptions, and to over-extrapolate small-scale and short-term specific results to generalized conclusions. These findings point to a lack of empirical and comprehensive research on SEI of GM crops for possible use in decision-making. Broader questions and improved methodologies, assisted by more rigorous peer-review, will be required to overcome current research shortcomings.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,346

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Well-ordered Science.Matthew Lister - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (9999):127-139.
The transatlantic rift in genetically modified food policy.Celina Ramjoué - 2007 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (5):419-436.
Staying Sober about Science.Rob Carlson - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (4):22-25.
Genetically Modified Crops, Inclusion, and Democracy.Daniel J. Hicks - 2017 - Perspectives on Science 25 (4):488-520.
The magic bullet criticism of agricultural biotechnology.Dane Scott - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (3):189-197.
Epistemological depth in a GM crops controversy.Daniel Hicks - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 50:1-12.
Looking for Moral Responsibility in Ownership: A Way to Deal with Hazards of GMOs.Zoë Robaey - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (1):43-56.


Added to PP

22 (#522,170)

6 months
2 (#299,341)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Reflexing Complexity.Brian Wynne - 2005 - Theory, Culture and Society 22 (5):67-94.
Experiments in Context and Contexting. [REVIEW]Ingunn Moser & Kristin Asdal - 2012 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 37 (4):291-306.
Coexistence of plants and coexistence of farmers: Is an individual choice possible? [REVIEW]Rosa Binimelis - 2008 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (5):437-457.

View all 8 references / Add more references