Socio-economic research on genetically modified crops: a study of the literature
Agriculture and Human Values 35 (2):489-513 (2018)
Abstract
The importance of socio-economic impacts from the introduction and use of genetically modified crops is reflected in increasing efforts to include them in regulatory frameworks. Aiming to identify and understand the present knowledge on SEI of GM crops, we here report the findings from an extensive study of the published international scientific peer-reviewed literature. After applying specified selection criteria, a total of 410 articles are analysed. The main findings include: limited empirical research on SEI of GM crops in the scientific literature; the main focus of the majority of the published research is on a restricted set of monetary economic parameters; proportionally, there are very few empirical studies on social and non-monetary economic aspects; most of the research reports only short-term findings; the variable local contexts and conditions are generally ignored in research methodology and analysis; conventional agriculture is the commonly used comparator, with minimal consideration of other substantially different agricultural systems; and there is the overall tendency to frame the research upon not validated theoretical assumptions, and to over-extrapolate small-scale and short-term specific results to generalized conclusions. These findings point to a lack of empirical and comprehensive research on SEI of GM crops for possible use in decision-making. Broader questions and improved methodologies, assisted by more rigorous peer-review, will be required to overcome current research shortcomings.My notes
Similar books and articles
Against the neoliberal steamroller? The Biosafety Protocol and the social regulation of agricultural biotechnologies.Daniel Lee Kleinman & Abby J. Kinchy - 2007 - Agriculture and Human Values 24 (2):195-206.
The transatlantic rift in genetically modified food policy.Celina Ramjoué - 2007 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (5):419-436.
Attitudes of Agricultural Experts Toward Genetically Modified Crops: A Case Study in Southwest Iran.Mansour Ghanian, Omid M. Ghoochani, Miranda Kitterlin, Sheida Jahangiry, Kiumars Zarafshani, Steven Van Passel & Hossein Azadi - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (2):509-524.
“No one asks for a meal they’ve never eaten.” Or, do African farmers want genetically modified crops?Matthew A. Schnurr & Sarah Mujabi-Mujuzi - 2014 - Agriculture and Human Values 31 (4):643-648.
Genetically Modified Crops, Inclusion, and Democracy.Daniel J. Hicks - 2017 - Perspectives on Science 25 (4):488-520.
Understanding the scope of farmer perceptions of risk: Considering farmer opinions on the use of genetically modified (gm) crops as a stakeholder voice in policy. [REVIEW]Nicholas P. Guehlstorf - 2008 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (6):541-558.
The Challenge of Scientific Uncertainty and Disunity in Risk Assessment and Management of GM Crops.Anne Ingeborg Myhr - 2010 - Environmental Values 19 (1):7-31.
Labeling Genetically Modified Food: The Philosophical and Legal Debate.Paul Weirich (ed.) - 2007 - Oup Usa.
The magic bullet criticism of agricultural biotechnology.Dane Scott - 2005 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 18 (3):189-197.
Epistemological depth in a GM crops controversy.Daniel Hicks - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 50:1-12.
Ethical Discourse on the Use of Genetically Modified Crops: A Review of Academic Publications in the Fields of Ecology and Environmental Ethics. [REVIEW]Daniel Gregorowius, Petra Lindemann-Matthies & Markus Huppenbauer - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (3):265-293.
Looking for Moral Responsibility in Ownership: A Way to Deal with Hazards of GMOs.Zoë Robaey - 2015 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (1):43-56.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-12-09
Downloads
22 (#522,170)
6 months
2 (#299,341)
2017-12-09
Downloads
22 (#522,170)
6 months
2 (#299,341)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
NGO perspectives on the social and ethical dimensions of plant genome-editing.Richard Helliwell, Sarah Hartley & Warren Pearce - 2019 - Agriculture and Human Values 36 (4):779-791.
Non-safety Assessments of Genome-Edited Organisms: Should They be Included in Regulation?Bjørn Kåre Myskja & Anne Ingeborg Myhr - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (5):2601-2627.
How consumers use mandatory genetic engineering (GE) labels: evidence from Vermont.Jane Kolodinsky, Sean Morris & Orest Pazuniak - 2019 - Agriculture and Human Values 36 (1):117-125.
With great power comes great responsibility: why ‘safe enough’ is not good enough in debates on new gene technologies.Sigfrid Kjeldaas, Tim Dassler, Trine Antonsen, Odd-Gunnar Wikmark & Anne I. Myhr - forthcoming - Agriculture and Human Values:1-13.
References found in this work
States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order.Sheila Jasanoff (ed.) - 2004 - Routledge.
Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed.James C. Scott - 1999 - Utopian Studies 10 (2):310-312.
Experiments in Context and Contexting. [REVIEW]Ingunn Moser & Kristin Asdal - 2012 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 37 (4):291-306.
Coexistence of plants and coexistence of farmers: Is an individual choice possible? [REVIEW]Rosa Binimelis - 2008 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (5):437-457.