History and Theory 44 (1):72–90 (2005)
In this essay I examine and discuss the concept “system of philosophy” as a methodological tool in the history of philosophy; I do so in two moves. First I analyze the historical origin of the concept in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Thereafter I undertake a discussion of its methodological weaknesses—a discussion that is not only relevant to the writing of history of philosophy in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, but also to the writing of history of philosophy in our times, where the concept remains an important methodological tool. My first move is to analyze Jacob Brucker’s employment of the concept in his influential history of philosophy, Historia critica philosophiae, dating from 1742–1744. To Brucker, a “system of philosophy” is characterized by the following four features: it is autonomous in regard to other, non-philosophical disciplines; all doctrines stated within the various branches of philosophy can be deduced from one principle; as an autonomous system it comprises all branches of philosophy; the doctrines stated within these various branches of philosophy are internally coherent. Brucker employed the concept on the entire history of philosophy, and he gave it a defining role in regard to two other methodological concepts, namely “eclecticism” and “syncretism,” which he regarded as more or less successful forms of systematic philosophy. My second move is to point out the weakness of the concept of “system of philosophy” as a methodological tool in the history of philosophy. I argue that the interdisciplinary nature of much premodern philosophy makes Brucker’s methodological concept “system of philosophy” inadequate, and that we may be better off leaving it behind in our future exploration of premodern philosophy
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Was Feyerabend a Popperian? Methodological Issues in the History of the Philosophy of Science.Matteo Collodel - forthcoming - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A.
Similar books and articles
Jacob Burckhardt, Religion, and the Historiography of "Crisis" and "Transition".Thomas Albert Howard - 1999 - Journal of the History of Ideas 60 (1):149-164.
Historical Truth, Historical Criticism, and Ideology: Chinese Historiography and Historical Culture From a New Comparative Perspective.Helwig Schmidt-Glintzer, Achim Mittag & Jörn Rüsen (eds.) - 2005 - Brill.
Spheres of Philosophical Inquiry and the Historiography of Medieval Philosophy.John Inglis - 1998 - Brill.
The Study of Lysogeny at the Pasteur Institute (1950-1960): An Epistemologically Open System.N. Peyrieras & M. Morange - 2002 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 33 (3):419-430.
Conscious Experience and Concept-Forming Abilities.Elisabeth Pacherie - 2000 - Acta Analytica 16 (26):45-52.
Nationalism, Historiography, and the (Re)Construction of the Past.Claire Norton (ed.) - 2007 - New Academia.
Brucker Versus Rorty? On the 'Models' of the Historiography of Philosophy.Gregorio Piaia - 2001 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 9 (1):69 – 81.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads44 ( #117,412 of 2,164,286 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,039 of 2,164,286 )
How can I increase my downloads?