Environmental Ethics 11 (4):327-343 (1989)

Abstract
The controversy between hunting apologists and their anti-hunting antagonists continues to escalate. Numerous attempts to settle the issue have failed in part because the participants have often not distinguished and treated separately the various activities labeled “hunting.” Those who participate in hunting fall into one of two categories: shooters or sport hunters. Shooters are those whose ultimate goals do not depend on hunting but can be met in other ways; sport hunters are those who take immense pleasure in the hunt itself and who kill in order to have had an authentic hunting experience. Discussion of the morality of hunting (as opposed to its prudence) is properly restricted to the moral evaluation of the desire of sport hunters to kill for pleasure. This desire can be explained by biological/evolutionary concepts and defended as morally neutral. Neither the animal protectionists nor the utilitarian apologists recognize that violent death is part of nature and that man’s desire to participate in it can be both natural and culturally valuable. Though well-intentioned, utilitarianism is an impotent ethical defense of hunting because it can judge only the prudence, not the morality, of hunting
Keywords Applied Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0163-4275
DOI 10.5840/enviroethics19891141
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,784
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Environmental Ethics and Trophy Hunting.Alastair S. Gunn - 2001 - Ethics and the Environment 6 (1):68-95.
Animal Liberationism, Ecocentrism, and the Morality of Sport Hunting.Maurice L. Wade - 1990 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 17 (1):15-27.
How to Argue for and Against Sport Hunting.Jordan Curnutt - 1996 - Journal of Social Philosophy 27 (2):65-89.
Aggression and Hunting Attitudes.Emma Peden & Marc Stewart Wilson - 2015 - Society and Animals 23 (1):3-23.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Is Hunting a Right Thing?Charles J. List - 1997 - Environmental Ethics 19 (4):405-416.
Is Hunting a “Sport”?John Alan Cohan - 2003 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (2):291-326.
The Morality of Hunting.Robert W. Loftin - 1984 - Environmental Ethics 6 (3):241-250.
Sport Hunting: Moral or Immoral?Theodore R. Vitali - 1990 - Environmental Ethics 12 (1):69-82.
On the Moral Significance of a Hunting Ethic.Charles J. List - 1998 - Ethics and the Environment 3 (2):157 - 175.
On the Moral Distinctiveness of Sport Hunting.Charles J. List - 2004 - Environmental Ethics 26 (2):155-169.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
139 ( #79,399 of 2,463,095 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #71,077 of 2,463,095 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes