Foundations of Physics 42 (10):1329-1338 (2012)

Authors
Eric Cavalcanti
Griffith University
Abstract
The 1964 theorem of John Bell shows that no model that reproduces the predictions of quantum mechanics can simultaneously satisfy the assumptions of locality and determinism. On the other hand, the assumptions of signal locality plus predictability are also sufficient to derive Bell inequalities. This simple theorem, previously noted but published only relatively recently by Masanes, Acin and Gisin, has fundamental implications not entirely appreciated. Firstly, nothing can be concluded about the ontological assumptions of locality or determinism independently of each other—it is possible to reproduce quantum mechanics with deterministic models that violate locality as well as indeterministic models that satisfy locality. On the other hand, the operational assumption of signal locality is an empirically testable (and well-tested) consequence of relativity. Thus Bell inequality violations imply that we can trust that some events are fundamentally unpredictable, even if we cannot trust that they are indeterministic. This result grounds the quantum-mechanical prohibition of arbitrarily accurate predictions on the assumption of no superluminal signalling, regardless of any postulates of quantum mechanics. It also sheds a new light on an early stage of the historical debate between Einstein and Bohr
Keywords Quantum foundations  Bell inequalities  No-signalling  Signal locality  Uncertainty  Unpredictability  Randomness  Determinism  Locality
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10701-012-9669-1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,355
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Randomness? What Randomness?Klaas Landsman - 2020 - Foundations of Physics 50 (2):61-104.
Quantum Reaxiomatisations and Information-Theoretic Interpretations of Quantum Theory.Leah Henderson - 2020 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 72:292-300.
The Wave Function as a True Ensemble.Jonte Hance & Sabine Hossenfelder - 2022 - Proceedings of the Royal Society 478 (2262).

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Locality, Bell's Theorem, and Quantum Mechanics.Peter Rastall - 1985 - Foundations of Physics 15 (9):963-972.
On the Consequences of Einstein Locality.F. Selleri - 1978 - Foundations of Physics 8 (1-2):103-116.
Quantum Locality.Robert B. Griffiths - 2011 - Foundations of Physics 41 (4):705-733.
Non-Materiality of Non-Locality.Vincenzo Fano - 2004 - Foundations of Physics 34 (12):2005-2013.
Against 'Realism'.Travis Norsen - 2007 - Foundations of Physics 37 (3):311-340.
Objectivity Vs. Locality in Quantum Physics.Ernst-Walther Stachow - 2010 - Foundations of Physics 40 (9-10):1450-1475.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-22

Total views
106 ( #111,857 of 2,519,516 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #205,550 of 2,519,516 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes